Go Back   The Supercar Registry > General Discussion > Technical & Restoration


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-10-2003, 01:37 PM
Mr70's Avatar
Mr70 Mr70 is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Illinois
Posts: 20,876
Thanks: 70
Thanked 3,454 Times in 1,407 Posts
Default Re: 1970 834 Alternators vs. 837's

The 837 37AMP Alternator applied on all the Solid Lifter engines.Also known as SPECIAL Hi-Perf engines.L-78,LS-6,LT-1.etc.It included the deep groove pulley and fan,but also the electrical internals were different then the 834,as well as the bearings to handle the higher RPM's.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 01-10-2003, 01:56 PM
Keith Tedford Keith Tedford is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,695
Thanks: 3
Thanked 55 Times in 12 Posts
Default Re: 1970 834 Alternators vs. 837's

According to the old GM parts book, the only difference between the '834 and '837 alternators is the pulley. The '834 got the small stamped pulley while the '837 got the larger deep grooved machined steel piece. The deep grooved pulleys were used on the solid lifter engines. 1100566, 1100836, 1100839, 1100841, and 1100842 are also the same except for the pulley. 1100742, 1100843, 1100845, and 1100917 have a different stator as well. All other internals are interchangeable.
__________________
Chevelleless after 46 years......but we did find a low mileage, six speed, silver 2005 Corvette. It will just have to do for now.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-10-2003, 02:21 PM
Mr70's Avatar
Mr70 Mr70 is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Illinois
Posts: 20,876
Thanks: 70
Thanked 3,454 Times in 1,407 Posts
Default Re: 1970 834 Alternators vs. 837's

Keith...that is interesting.
When I needed my 837 Alt. restored,I considered swaping out the guts with an 834.I was going to do it myself.I called JP in Georgia,when he said not to do that.He said there are more differences involved in that alternator,as I stated above,and that I should send it to him to be correctly restored internally.Now maybe he was just trying to make a sale,only cost me $85.00 back then,but I believed him.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 02:43 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.

O Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.