Go Back   The Supercar Registry > General Discussion > Lounge


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #61  
Old 03-08-2025, 07:56 PM
Lynn Lynn is online now
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 7,679
Thanks: 81
Thanked 3,448 Times in 1,466 Posts
Default

Yeah, but with auto trans, not too much.

The Crane hydraulic roller I used in the El Camino and still have in my 49 Studebaker dump truck idled dead smooth; but it was a torque monstor. Used Morel lifters and stock Chevy valvle springs.

I know I have the part number some where.
__________________
Don't believe everything you read on the internet ... Ben Franklin
Reply With Quote
  #62  
Old 03-08-2025, 09:10 PM
Lynn Lynn is online now
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 7,679
Thanks: 81
Thanked 3,448 Times in 1,466 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by olredalert View Post
----Pretty damn good looking pile if you ask me. Are you going to build a 270HP or the 245HP ? Keeping my fingers and toe's crossed that you say 270....Bill S
Bill: you have to consider the source of the "pile" comment.

Have you seen pics of that 67 Camaro Charley commissioned? Everything I have looks like a pile in comparison. Of course, Charley's 57 four door hardtop FI car with PW & PS (the "rustoleum car") looks like a pile compared to that Camaro. He won the "janitor's award" at MCACN a few years back with that 57, which is a really cool car.

All in good fun.
__________________
Don't believe everything you read on the internet ... Ben Franklin
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Lynn For This Useful Post:
Charley Lillard (03-10-2025), olredalert (03-08-2025)
  #63  
Old 03-08-2025, 09:16 PM
olredalert olredalert is online now
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Marine City, Mi.
Posts: 9,272
Thanks: 31,477
Thanked 4,336 Times in 1,844 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lynn View Post
Bill: you have to consider the source of the "pile" comment.

Have you seen pics of that 67 Camaro Charley commissioned? Everything I have looks like a pile in comparison. Of course, Charley's 57 four door hardtop FI car with PW & PS (the "rustoleum car") looks like a pile compared to that Camaro. He won the "janitor's award" at MCACN a few years back with that 57, which is a really cool car.

All in good fun.
----Ahh,,,Playing cagy on the HP. This is a need to know deal, you know!.....Bill S
Reply With Quote
  #64  
Old 03-08-2025, 11:29 PM
Too Many Projects's Avatar
Too Many Projects Too Many Projects is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2020
Location: Town of Troy, WI
Posts: 4,922
Thanks: 2,570
Thanked 3,705 Times in 1,691 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lynn View Post
Yeah, but with auto trans, not too much.

The Crane hydraulic roller I used in the El Camino and still have in my 49 Studebaker dump truck idled dead smooth; but it was a torque monstor. Used Morel lifters and stock Chevy valvle springs.

I know I have the part number some where.
Put an '86 GN torque converter with 1,700-2,200 stall and it's all good. I have that in my '38 coupe and no converter creep.
OK, I also have a 200-4R trans. Not clue if it will match to a PG.
__________________
Mitch
1970 Chevelle SS
1966 Chevelle SS
1967 Camaro ss/rs
1938 Business coupe, street rod
2000 FXSTS, original owner, 13k miles
Reply With Quote
  #65  
Old 03-09-2025, 03:28 AM
Lynn Lynn is online now
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 7,679
Thanks: 81
Thanked 3,448 Times in 1,466 Posts
Default

I know it seems nuts to even consider a trans swap, but I am seriously considering going with a 4L60E when I install the dual quad engine.

Don't have to cut one thing to do it other than the driveshaft (and i can always pick up a used drive shaft to cut down) and can always save the PG in case someone wants to go back original. That OD trans with a lock up converter would work great with the current 3.55 screw.
__________________
Don't believe everything you read on the internet ... Ben Franklin
Reply With Quote
  #66  
Old 03-09-2025, 03:38 AM
Too Many Projects's Avatar
Too Many Projects Too Many Projects is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2020
Location: Town of Troy, WI
Posts: 4,922
Thanks: 2,570
Thanked 3,705 Times in 1,691 Posts
Default

200 4R is a direct replacement for the PG/TH350, no driveshaft cutting, just move the crossmember back, which I'm rather certain you need to do for the 4L60 too. The 4L is also based on the old TH400/700 r4 and has the larger case. Are people able to install that in the tri-five tunnel without cutting/modification ? I know the cast iron PG I removed from '54 was quite beefy and may have been larger than the aluminum case ones ??
My 200 is built for 450 hp 500 torque, there isn't anything that little 283 is going to do to hurt one built right.
__________________
Mitch
1970 Chevelle SS
1966 Chevelle SS
1967 Camaro ss/rs
1938 Business coupe, street rod
2000 FXSTS, original owner, 13k miles
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Too Many Projects For This Useful Post:
big gear head (03-10-2025)
  #67  
Old 03-09-2025, 06:45 AM
John Brown's Avatar
John Brown John Brown is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: South Bend, Indiana
Posts: 2,820
Thanks: 455
Thanked 509 Times in 243 Posts
Default

A rear transmission mount and crossmember would be needed. Don't know about the strength of the front of the transmission case with the front engine mounts being so far forward though.
__________________
......................
John Brown

This isn't rocket surgery.....
Reply With Quote
  #68  
Old 03-09-2025, 02:05 PM
Lynn Lynn is online now
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 7,679
Thanks: 81
Thanked 3,448 Times in 1,466 Posts
Default

There is a kit available for mounting the trans to the original location using bell housing bolts, and it takes all the stress off the bell housing.
Yes, the 4L60E fits just fine. There is a LOT of room; way more than there was in the El Camino. And I didn't even need to ding the floor to install that one. Just need a shorter drive shaft.

Would definitely consider a 200 4R, if I found one for a decent price. Because it IS a direct fit on all the 50s 60s and even 70s cars, they are getting scarce and more expensive.

Regardless, any such nonsense is down the road a ways. I need to get back to work on the LT-1. Keep getting distracted.
__________________
Don't believe everything you read on the internet ... Ben Franklin
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Lynn For This Useful Post:
John Brown (03-09-2025)
  #69  
Old 03-09-2025, 02:15 PM
Too Many Projects's Avatar
Too Many Projects Too Many Projects is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2020
Location: Town of Troy, WI
Posts: 4,922
Thanks: 2,570
Thanked 3,705 Times in 1,691 Posts
Default

Agree, they are getting more difficult find.
NOW, get to work on the 'vette...
I have been distracted from the Camaro for some time too, but have been making slow progress on prepping the doors and fenders.
__________________
Mitch
1970 Chevelle SS
1966 Chevelle SS
1967 Camaro ss/rs
1938 Business coupe, street rod
2000 FXSTS, original owner, 13k miles
Reply With Quote
  #70  
Old 03-09-2025, 03:53 PM
Lynn Lynn is online now
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 7,679
Thanks: 81
Thanked 3,448 Times in 1,466 Posts
Default

You are doing better than me. Mine is just collecting dust!
__________________
Don't believe everything you read on the internet ... Ben Franklin
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:16 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.

O Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.