Dedicated to the Promotion and Preservation of American Muscle Cars, Dealer built Supercars and COPO cars. |
|
#2
11-27-2008, 09:54 AM
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Block Stamp
Clarity of the photo is not adequate to determine broaching authenticity. Partial VIN from what I can detect is not correct. "7" should be an alpha character for the plant that the car was assembled ad there should be 2 more numbers preceding this.
__________________
Sam...  
|
|
#3
11-27-2008, 10:17 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Block Stamp
Hey Sam
Actually this is done in the correct way for Corvettes. They did not put the S in front of the vin. Maybe because they were all built in the same place? Not saying this is or isn't THE original stamp, that would be above my pay grade.
__________________
Dana MBTMF
|
|
#4
11-27-2008, 05:05 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Block Stamp
[ QUOTE ]
Clarity of the photo is not adequate to determine broaching authenticity. Partial VIN from what I can detect is not correct. "7" should be an alpha character for the plant that the car was assembled ad there should be 2 more numbers preceding this. [/ QUOTE ] I agree with the broach mark on the block. The photo need to be clearer to determine authenticity or a good restoration block. The only item I am a little sceptical about is the stamps. The characters seem correct but usually the gang that hold the stamps is a little sloppy thus the numbers would not be so perfect to each other. Just my .02
|
|
#5
11-27-2008, 07:42 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Block Stamp
[ QUOTE ]
Clarity of the photo is not adequate to determine broaching authenticity. Partial VIN from what I can detect is not correct. "7" should be an alpha character for the plant that the car was assembled ad there should be 2 more numbers preceding this. [/ QUOTE ] Dana - Corvette you say? That's one of them fandangled plastic cars I've heard about............................................. ......................................... 
__________________
Sam...
|
|
#6
11-27-2008, 09:16 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Block Stamp
If that CON VIN configuration is correct for a Corvette, then one would assume this is supposed to be a 67 427/435. The stampings look good to me, but have to agree with Sam that a clearer picture is necessary to get a good look at the machined surface.
__________________
Bill Pritchard 73 Camaro RS Z28, L82, M20, C60
|
|
#7
11-27-2008, 10:30 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Block Stamp
Yes Sam, there is something besides steel out there. Once you have had a midyear it is hard to get it out of your blood, especially a big block. That glass does itch though when you sand it. I like steel too.
__________________
Dana MBTMF
|
|
#8
11-28-2008, 02:36 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Block Stamp
Glass is fun to work with... sometimes LOL!
__________________
~JAG~ NCRS#65120 68 GTO HO 4 spd Alpine Blue /Parchment 2 owner car #21783 71 Corvette LT1 45k miles Orig paint - Brandshatch Green - National Top Flight - last known 71 LT1 built. 71 Corvette LT1 42k miles Original paint - Black - black leather - only black LT1 known to exist. NUMEROUS Lemans blue Camaros, Monza Red and Daytona Yellow Corvettes & a Chevelle or two... Survivors, restored cars, & other photos https://picasaweb.google.com/lh/myphotos
|
|
#9
11-28-2008, 11:03 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Block Stamp
The picture is not clear enough to see a broach. I compared to other '67 Corvettes in my picture library and I think the stamps look good. I'm comfortable with the "7" in the VIN and it should have only seven digits in the vin.
|
|
#10
11-29-2008, 04:45 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Block Stamp
That '67 Corvette was built on February 13, 1967; the engine build date is October 13th, 1966, and the suffix indicates an L-71 (427/435hp) with K-19. I'm not comfortable with an engine sitting around at St. Louis for four months before going in a car; it'd be a stretch to call that anywhere near a normal time span. What's the casting number and date?
__________________
'69 Z/28 Fathom Green CRG
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
