![]() |
Block Stamp
|
Re: Block Stamp
Clarity of the photo is not adequate to determine broaching authenticity. Partial VIN from what I can detect is not correct. "7" should be an alpha character for the plant that the car was assembled ad there should be 2 more numbers preceding this.
|
Re: Block Stamp
Hey Sam
Actually this is done in the correct way for Corvettes. They did not put the S in front of the vin. Maybe because they were all built in the same place? Not saying this is or isn't THE original stamp, that would be above my pay grade. |
Re: Block Stamp
[ QUOTE ]
Clarity of the photo is not adequate to determine broaching authenticity. Partial VIN from what I can detect is not correct. "7" should be an alpha character for the plant that the car was assembled ad there should be 2 more numbers preceding this. [/ QUOTE ] I agree with the broach mark on the block. The photo need to be clearer to determine authenticity or a good restoration block. The only item I am a little sceptical about is the stamps. The characters seem correct but usually the gang that hold the stamps is a little sloppy thus the numbers would not be so perfect to each other. Just my .02 |
Re: Block Stamp
[ QUOTE ]
Clarity of the photo is not adequate to determine broaching authenticity. Partial VIN from what I can detect is not correct. "7" should be an alpha character for the plant that the car was assembled ad there should be 2 more numbers preceding this. [/ QUOTE ] Dana - Corvette you say? That's one of them fandangled plastic cars I've heard about............................................. ......................................... https://www.yenko.net/ubbthreads/imag...lins/blush.gif |
Re: Block Stamp
If that CON VIN configuration is correct for a Corvette, then one would assume this is supposed to be a 67 427/435. The stampings look good to me, but have to agree with Sam that a clearer picture is necessary to get a good look at the machined surface.
|
Re: Block Stamp
Yes Sam, there is something besides steel out there. Once you have had a midyear it is hard to get it out of your blood, especially a big block. That glass does itch though when you sand it. I like steel too. https://www.yenko.net/ubbthreads/imag...ns/burnout.gif
|
Re: Block Stamp
Glass is fun to work with... sometimes LOL!
|
Re: Block Stamp
The picture is not clear enough to see a broach. I compared to other '67 Corvettes in my picture library and I think the stamps look good. I'm comfortable with the "7" in the VIN and it should have only seven digits in the vin.
|
Re: Block Stamp
That '67 Corvette was built on February 13, 1967; the engine build date is October 13th, 1966, and the suffix indicates an L-71 (427/435hp) with K-19. I'm not comfortable with an engine sitting around at St. Louis for four months before going in a car; it'd be a stretch to call that anywhere near a normal time span. What's the casting number and date?
https://www.yenko.net/ubbthreads/imag...lins/beers.gif |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:21 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.