Dedicated to the Promotion and Preservation of American Muscle Cars, Dealer built Supercars and COPO cars. |
|
#1
02-14-2003, 02:25 AM
|
|||
|
|||
COIL SPRINGS
I HAVE ONE SET OF NOS FRONT COIL SPINGS # 3355712
WHAT DO THEY FIT ???? [img]/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/dunno.gif[/img] <font color="red"> </font> 
|
|
#2
02-14-2003, 04:23 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: COIL SPRINGS
RED427,
I do not have my books with me, are you sure it is 3<font color="red">3</font>55712 and not 3<font color="red">9</font>55712 (Code EM)? 3955712 was a Camaro/Nova production spring. Later it was a generic replacement spring for several other codes. I could give you the weight ranges when I get back in town if you want them. G.
__________________
Nova Research Project at chevynova.org
|
|
#4
02-15-2003, 02:19 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: COIL SPRINGS
3955712 was used on the following applications:
69 Camaro Code EM 12337 front spring weight range 273-340. 12367 (base eng ex. JL8) front spring weight range 193-260. 12437 (base eng with JL8) and (L48, L65) front spring weight range 179-246. 12467 (base eng with JL8) and (L48, L65) front spring weight range 97-164. This spring replaced 3955711 Code EL and 3955713 Code EQ (one weight range higher and lower than EM) for over the counter use in March 70 70 Nova Code EM was a production spring. I have not found a production chart or weights chart for this year. 3955712 was the replacement spring for the following: 70 Nova (4-Dr.) (350) standard suspension 70 Nova (2-Dr.) (396) standard suspension 70 Nova (4-Dr.) (396) standard suspension Does this help? I am working on the spring calculators for the 69 Camaro. Weight ranges were dependant on the total option weight.
__________________
Nova Research Project at chevynova.org
|
|
#5
02-15-2003, 02:24 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: COIL SPRINGS
Hey Greg,
I think your book as a typo. A 70 396 Nova 4 door? Ron [img]/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/  [/img]
|
|
#6
02-15-2003, 02:38 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: COIL SPRINGS
That's what the book said. They spec'd the book for upgrading springs. This was from the 62-70 P&A book. In the 70 Only P&A book the rows were not aligned right. It looked like the application was listed as 396 with and without C.A.C. and Nova with C.A.C. But with and without air was on almost every line.
__________________
Nova Research Project at chevynova.org
|
|
#7
02-15-2003, 11:14 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: COIL SPRINGS
IF THEY WERE BOUGHT IN 1976? WOW IS THIS A DURECELL THING?..............GOING AND GOING? [img]/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/worship.gif[/img] [img]/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/scholar.gif[/img]
|
|
#9
02-18-2003, 06:06 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: COIL SPRINGS
No problem. Glad to be of help. Greg
__________________
Nova Research Project at chevynova.org
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
