LETS HAVE SOME OPINIONS OF WIW ON THIS CAR

[MultiMopars]

Her is the link to it:

http://www.hemmings.com/classifieds/...ry/952240.html

[x Baldwin Motion]

I may not be qualified to opine, but I did spot a typo in the ad; a couple of extra "zero's" in the price.

[Dog427435]

Wow!!! One to many six packs I think??




[b] 45K - YIKES!!!

[agtw31]

that has to be a misprint.
that car came from a junkyard in ga,i believe he paid a couple grand for it a few years back.
he has a few of those.

[wheelhop]

Rare fender delete option is driving up the price.

[MultiMopars]

Oh it is not a misprint. I found this in a thread on Moparts.com This guy has the market cornered on six pack "C" bodies. They built very few of thenm and I think he owns like 6 of them. I don't think any of them are restored or driving but I could be wrong on that.

Think of a 1969 Impala with a factory intalled 427/435 engine. Yeah, I know they never built one, but this is what it would compare to if they did.

[agtw31]

here is where it came from,back in 2003

[Steven J]

It's a tough one to put a price on, but I would go as high as 15k due to the rarity.

[Bill Pritchard]

I honestly don't have a good idea of real worth (what could you compare it to?), but I am willing to bet that it's a lot less than what he's asking. This is yet another instance where rarity does not necessarily equate to desirability...69 or 70 full size Chrysler products have never exactly set the collector car market on fire. Anyone who would do a proper restoration on that car would be so far upside down it would redefine the term, and it would still be NOM!

[Xplantdad]

[ QUOTE ]
I honestly don't have a good idea of real worth (what could you compare it to?), but I am willing to bet that it's a lot less than what he's asking. This is yet another instance where rarity does not necessarily equate to desirability...69 or 70 full size Chrysler products have never exactly set the collector car market on fire. Anyone who would do a proper restoration on that car would be so far upside down it would redefine the term, and it would still be NOM!

[/ QUOTE ]

You read my mind Bill!