Go Back   The Supercar Registry > General Discussion > Other Muscle


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-11-2003, 12:58 AM
Bobcat Bobcat is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Bloomfield, Michigan
Posts: 23
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default Re: 1966 GTO 421??

PMD did not officially put 421's in GTO's for public consumption. There wer some GTO's bulit with 421 from the factory, BUT and that is a BIG BUT, the owners rearly know it. If the factory was short on 389's a it was not uncommon to put a 326 or 421 in to a car slated for some other engins. Ther was NO way the line was going to be stopped for somthing like this. It was common that an engine slated for installation would be pulled from the line by engineering just to test it for tollerances. This would disrupt the sequence for a few cars. Yes, there was a 1966 421 tri power. There were also dealerships that installed 421's as a commom practice. Royal Pontiac, MI, Packer Pontiac MI and FL and Myrtl Motors NY, Gay Pontiac TX, Colony Pontiac FL and others. Hope this helps
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-11-2003, 03:09 PM
copo9566aa copo9566aa is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Montréal, Québec ,Canada Je me souviens
Posts: 1,112
Thanks: 0
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Default Re: 1966 GTO 421??

[ QUOTE ]
If the factory was short on 389's a it was not uncommon to put a 326 or 421 in to a car slated for some other engins. Ther was NO way the line was going to be stopped for somthing like this. It was common that an engine slated for installation would be pulled from the line by engineering just to test it for tollerances.

[/ QUOTE ] this is not cool for an all numbers match 389 GTO [img]/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/blush.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-18-2003, 03:56 AM
Bobcat Bobcat is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Bloomfield, Michigan
Posts: 23
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default Re: 1966 GTO 421??

In 1966 the vin was not stamped into the block. The block number was a unit number that would only be on the paper work. Numbers matching was not an issue at the factory. The date codes are within an exceptable span with most purists. If you look your engine over the heads are not nessarily the same date and time and rarely is the head the same as the block date. The assemblers aren't going to take the time to check date codes or casting #'s. '66 Cars may have
one 092 head and one 093. What than? Tell me would you have noticed? I doubt it. If you had an early or late car you got a hadge podge of parts. They used whatever was in the bin and fit was used.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-18-2003, 07:13 PM
copo9566aa copo9566aa is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Montréal, Québec ,Canada Je me souviens
Posts: 1,112
Thanks: 0
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Default Re: 1966 GTO 421??

Welcome Bobcat [img]/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/burnout.gif[/img]
Cool and funny the world of Pontiac and Royal Bobcat [img]/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/cool.gif[/img]
Very special history [img]/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/beers.gif[/img]
Attached Images
 
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12-18-2003, 10:37 PM
DaJudge DaJudge is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: PAUSA
Posts: 731
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: 1966 GTO 421??

Good info on both posts Bobcat. The official stance from the factory and publications are that no 421's or 428's were factory installed. Special dealers like Royal etc. installed these engines for customers as an upgrade or upcharge. Unless it can be substantially documented as such you would have to agree that a GTO with this conversion would be an incorrect restoration. I disagree with your expanation of non-matching vin numbers in cars and that if one was off the whole line would suffer. One engine may be outfitted for A/C and power steering etc for a vehicle. If the next vehicle in line had or was missing these options the accessory mounting brackets are different as are balancer pulleys and water pump pulleys. Pictures that I have seen show all accessories on the engine before installation into the chassis. The workers would create bigger problems for themselves and really slow down production if they followed your explanation. My friend owned a 70 RA III Judge that was an original paint car and never touched a real survivor by the strictest definition of the term. It had three build sheets and only three owners. The car was ordered as a RA IV but came through as a III. The last digit was a 5 like a IV block should be but was coded a RA III WS block. The VIN on the block and trans was one digit off from the VIN plate. When the VIN number on the block and trans was submitted to PHS it was run through every possible vehicle series . The VIN on the block and trans came back "does not exist" from PHS. The engine and trans never left the engine bay on this car ever. This is an example of a factory mistake that from what I am told happened more than once.
__________________
<span style="color: blue">1970 GTO Judge Ram Air IV, 4 speed</span>
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 12-18-2003, 10:52 PM
Steve_Hoog's Avatar
Steve_Hoog Steve_Hoog is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Tulsa OK
Posts: 1,275
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: 1966 GTO 421??

OK Coppo I wanna know the story behind this gem of a photo, cough up the goods [img]/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/biggthumpup.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 12-19-2003, 12:04 AM
Pantera Pantera is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Tulsa OKLA
Posts: 1,337
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Default Re: 1966 GTO 421??

That is great I have never seen the fixture that GM used to pickup the motors. Makes it easier to understand the brackets that came on the motors from the factory. I had something totally different in my mind.
[img]/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/worship.gif[/img]
__________________
70 BM Phase III GT Vette
69 BM SS427 GT vette?
69 L78 Nova 7k mi
73 Pantera
69 Vette B/P SCCA
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 12-19-2003, 02:16 AM
Steve_Hoog's Avatar
Steve_Hoog Steve_Hoog is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Tulsa OK
Posts: 1,275
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: 1966 GTO 421??

Sorry Copo... I was in such awe over the pic, I didn't scroll down to see the caption.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 12-11-2003, 03:17 PM
sixtiesmuscle sixtiesmuscle is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Chicago suburb
Posts: 1,093
Thanks: 0
Thanked 6 Times in 4 Posts
Default Re: 1966 GTO 421??

Are you saying that the factory would install an engine that had the wrong vin stamped on it? If they just went down the line with engines, how many could be misinstalled?? Wouldn't this be fraud?
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 12-11-2003, 05:10 PM
442w30 442w30 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Gabba Gabba Hey! NYC
Posts: 2,531
Thanks: 219
Thanked 148 Times in 73 Posts
Default Re: 1966 GTO 421??

I think it's an old wive's tale. Using that logic, there's some 326 Tempest out there with a 421.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 09:53 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.

O Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.