Barrett Jackson Las Vegas

[68 Vert]

I have a question, are the draft and final reports noted as such (draft only, final report)?

Mike

[Charley Lillard]

704ever..... You apparently are not over whatever pissed you off about Jerry in some past life. You appear to have used this site and issue as a podium for some past grudge. If you are going to slam someone, please stick to facts. I'm trying to moderate here and you come bashing based on something we know nothing about. You have managed to make yourself the focus of the thread and the person I am getting complaints about. Don't make me use my vast amounts of Grand Yenko.net Poohbah power to stifle you on this site.

I'm not siding with Jerry. I am just trying to make sense of this mess and not let anyone get trashed over something we know nothing about.

[x Baldwin Motion]

[ QUOTE ]
I have a question, are the draft and final reports noted as such (draft only, final report)?

Mike

[/ QUOTE ]

That is what I was also wondering. If the car owner had a "draft" with no indication of such why would they bother paying for a "final" or even showing it if the draft looked fine and gave a more favorable description ( no mention of rebody, restamp or resto drive train)?

The documents shown online as the three page report looked very official and matter of fact. They gave no indication of pending verification or the ever present underwriters reveiw.
I respect Jerry since he has said that it is true that there is no way to tell if the hidden vins were changed or if the car is a rebody when the metal work is perfect.

This seems to be just another lesson for us all.

Stick a fork in it.

[Hylton]

[ QUOTE ]
I respect Jerry since he has said that it is true that there is no way to tell if the hidden vins were changed or if the car is a rebody when the metal work is perfect.

[/ QUOTE ]

Not true. I believe 90% of the rebodies out there can be determined provided you are able to remove interior parts and examin other dated chassis components.

You cannot remove a trim tag and put it back without visible signs that it had been off the car at one time.
Study trim tag rivets from underneath the dash instead of the engine bay side and you'll see what I am talking about .

[southernfriedcj]

Wow, what drama!

[fastessfreddy]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I have a question, are the draft and final reports noted as such (draft only, final report)?

Mike

[/ QUOTE ]

That is what I was also wondering. If the car owner had a \"draft\" with no indication of such why would they bother paying for a \"final\" or even showing it if the draft looked fine and gave a more favorable description ( no mention of rebody, restamp or resto drive train)?

The documents shown online as the three page report looked very official and matter of fact. They gave no indication of pending verification or the ever present underwriters reveiw.
.

[/ QUOTE ]

I cant agree any further.besides didnt jerry himself say it was only a three page report?
now is it four?if true jerry should have sent the fourth page only with disclosure of it being a restoration drivetrain.and holding the first three that says official authentication.

you know,while thinking about this i think the whole think stinks of fraud all around.a separate piece of paper saying restamp and nothing on the first three pages look like fraud to me.

kind of makes you wonder.

[fastessfreddy]

does jerry authenticate other cars as well?like COPO cars and other model checvy\'s or just camaro\'s??i\'m sorry but this really opens up everybodies eyes to \"real\"cars anymore.

[Jeff H]

I don't think there is any extra page, it was a finalized version with the details added about the drivetrain and the tags for sale on Ebay. I think a lot of people read the report and translate it into what they want it to say. If you don't understand comments on it, you should talk to CHP for clarification. I don't understand why so many people are attacking Jerry when he flagged the car appropriately with his final report. The seller is the one who decided to deceive people by showing the preliminary report with the list of incorrect items.

[TDW]

fastess...you must have read something different than what is posted on the CRG site. The first page, last line, clearly states "restoration drive train". It has 3 pages. I don't see anywhere that says there is a 4th page. Where is that info at?