![]() Dedicated to the Promotion and Preservation of American Muscle Cars, Dealer built Supercars and COPO cars. |
|
Register | Album Gallery | Thread Gallery | FAQ | Community | Calendar | Become a Paid Member | Today's Posts | Search |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
those are different cars, no? one is a hard top, the other a convertible.
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
those are different cars, no? one is a hard top, the other a convertible. [/ QUOTE ] That they are... ![]()
__________________
Bruce Choose Life-Donate! |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
If I am not mistaken, isn't the hard top an L89?
If that's correct, I beleive this car was a Arizona Classic Car Dealership in 2004 that I came across. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
If I am not mistaken, isn't the hard top an L89? [/ QUOTE ] All I remember is it's an L78, at least according to the air cleaner. If there was a sign indicating it was a L89, I don't remember it. I just know it was one of the more drool-inducing Cameros I've seen in quite awhile. (And, yes, I misspelled it on purpose - doncha hate when people spell it wrong? ![]() |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The engine pic and front license plate say L89.
__________________
TheMuscleCarGuys.com |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Can't argue with that, right? :-)
I was just curious if the car was real. All too often, some of these cars are too good to be true, and as Camaros have to rely on documentation, that's what interested me. It certainly looks like one of the top Camaros in my eyes as far as equipment goes. |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
Can't argue with that, right? :-) I was just curious if the car was real. All too often, some of these cars are too good to be true, and as Camaros have to rely on documentation, that's what interested me. It certainly looks like one of the top Camaros in my eyes as far as equipment goes. [/ QUOTE ] I think it's really cool as well! ![]()
__________________
Bruce Choose Life-Donate! |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
...All too often, some of these cars are too good to be true, and as Camaros have to rely on documentation... [/ QUOTE ] Even w/ supposed 'bulletproof' docs there's sure lots more homework to be done!. I may be wrong but wasn't there yellow '69 L89 Coupe w/ Canadian docs we here on this site viewed pics of and questioned a year or so back?. Again sorry if I'm remembering wrong but I seem to recall it appeared possible someone could have started w/ Canadian L89 documents and built the car to match incl. the obvious repop Cowl Tag that was shown also a Vin tag that was in question but not displayed?. ![]() ~ Pete
__________________
I like real cars best...especially the REAL real ones! |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
If I am not mistaken, isn't the hard top an L89? If that's correct, I beleive this car was a Arizona Classic Car Dealership in 2004 that I came across. [/ QUOTE ] I inspected that car, it was right down the street from us, I think as recently as a couple of years ago, not sure, i sent some pics to Chuck ... no parking brake cables on it when I saw it ... some details were not correct back then ...
__________________
Jim R Scottsdale, AZ ![]() |
#10
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
those are different cars, no? one is a hard top, the other a convertible. [/ QUOTE ] yes, and the owners went to different high schools together. ![]() |
![]() |
|
|