Go Back   The Supercar Registry > General Discussion > Supercar/Musclecar Discussion


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 05-12-2008, 07:34 AM
Andy Andy is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Cleveland, Georgia
Posts: 403
Thanks: 153
Thanked 201 Times in 63 Posts
Default Re: 67z vs 93z

No offense, but if the LT1 car is a 6 speed, and has a good driver it will walk your 67 Z. My uncle has an almost stock 94 Z28, and it will eat my 67 alive. A friend of mine has the bolt-on LT1 record, an 11.70 @ 114. Granted, the car has been lightened up, it has a 12 bolt with 4.33 gears, roller rockers, cold air intake, and headers, but no other modifications have been made. A good driver in a bone stock LT1 should be able to run a 13.4-13.6 with good track conditions. My friends car making a pass. http://lsx.streetfire.net/video/cfa3...6101222244.htm
__________________
Andy
1967 Camaro 406 4 speed
1969 C/10 383 5 speed
1969 D300 318 4 speed
1969 Super Bee 383 4 speed
1972 K/5 350 Turbo 350
1972 Duster 340 727
1974 'Cuda 340 4 speed
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 05-12-2008, 06:12 PM
Kim_Howie Kim_Howie is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Posts: 4,411
Thanks: 6
Thanked 30 Times in 18 Posts
Default Re: 67z vs 93z

OK OK you guys win
__________________
Jake is my grandson!!
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 05-12-2008, 06:24 PM
Chevy454 Chevy454 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Alton, MO, USA
Posts: 11,923
Thanks: 0
Thanked 8 Times in 8 Posts
Default Re: 67z vs 93z

[ QUOTE ]
A good driver in a bone stock LT1 should be able to run a 13.4-13.6 with good track conditions.

[/ QUOTE ]I'd have to see that to believe it, Andy...that's a decent number for the LS1 cars.

The '67 Zs are the lightest of the bunch, and are gonna have the best shot at knocking off it's newer cousin...for reference, I *believe* Hot Rod did a test back in the day of a '68 Z...they wanted to see how quick they could get the car in stock condition, just by tuning it and playing with the car, on street tires...I've posted it before here, but I believe it was mid-13s @ around 106 or so...
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 05-12-2008, 06:39 PM
ORIGLS6 ORIGLS6 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Fishin' in the Dark
Posts: 7,410
Thanks: 1,102
Thanked 509 Times in 145 Posts
Default Re: 67z vs 93z

If I remember correctly, (in the early 70s) AHRA had the 67 and 68 Z-28s in different (Stock) classes ............... due to weight.
__________________
Don't mistake education for intelligence. I worked with educated people. I socialize with intelligent people.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 05-12-2008, 06:58 PM
Chevy454 Chevy454 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Alton, MO, USA
Posts: 11,923
Thanks: 0
Thanked 8 Times in 8 Posts
Default Re: 67z vs 93z

Ok, *finally* found my post on the '68 Z test...

[ QUOTE ]
It was done by SS&DI, Nov '68, and was the start of their "Project Camaro" series. Here's the run down...

Test: '68 Z/28, ordered with 4.30 posi, spoilers, M22, power disc brakes, and floor mats. Total cost: $3,686.55

- Heater assembly & AIR pump removed, due to the car being in an accident just prior to starting the project. Everything else was rebuilt as it was from the factory.
- It was given a general tune-up (points/valves checked, etc), rev box (set at 7600), set of Stewart Warner guages, and a 340hp Corvette distributor. Stock Wide Track GT Goodyears and stock exhaust manifolds are still in place...car is basically as it arrived from Chevrolet.
- car weighed 3165 with 12 gallons of fuel aboard.
- Very first run was a [email protected], which proved to be the worst ET and MPH for the car that day.
- Valves run, new set of AC43s, car cooled down..it then runs a 13.99 @106.50, then a [email protected]
- Dropped air pressure in tires to 22psi, installed Champion J6J plugs, and timing reset to 40 degrees. Made 3 more passes, best of which was a [email protected].
- Rejetted to 72/70-76 and new J63 plugs, and the car goes [email protected].
- Installed Champion HO3 plugs, replaced air cleaner, let the car cool off, then went a best of [email protected].

So, in a matter of a few hours, they managed to knock off 6 tenth just by fiddling with the car. And that's mid 13s with a pretty strong MPH, on the skinnies, and through the stock exhaust manifolds. Unfortunately, most people spend the few hours they *should be* tuning instead installing a set of headers or a bigger carb or...

[/ QUOTE ]

So, a respectable 13.6 @ 106+ from a few hours of tuning, granted, the car was heater delete, which *I believe* was doable on a '68, but adding a heater ain't gonna slow the car down a whole lot...and remember, this was on the stock Wide Track GT Goodyears and through stock exhaust manifolds!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 04:57 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.

O Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.