Dedicated to the Promotion and Preservation of American Muscle Cars, Dealer built Supercars and COPO cars. |
|
|||||||
| Register | Album Gallery | Thread Gallery | FAQ | Community | Calendar | Become a Paid Member | Today's Posts | Search |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
It appears that this car possibly sold outside of eBay?
The ad has been pulled. Congrats! (hopefully) |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Congrats to the Seller and to the buyer!
![]() Kurt, I too could waste pages in reply to you. Not going to do that - I have far better things to do, as you are clearly in damage control mode now with back to back posts cluttering up a simple discussion. Proof of your claims or info to back it up all coming from a Research Site (that by policy) gathers but does not share information. Again and simple: In '67 paper work was with the body at Fisher. (Photo Shows that) All '67 bodies had a Trim Tag installed early on that contained specific option content that was related downline to a final build order to which a VIN# was assigned on a "scrambled" order at final assembly. ("Scrambled" is your term not mine- although I gotta say I have to agree) It is in the implementation of the process that you disagree with me, and that is fine with me - but it is awfully clear that my opinion although clearly supported with evidence (as I outlined above) and my simple act of disagreeing with you - is not acceptable to you at all. On the freedom of speech thing it is pretty clear that you are obsessed with proving your point - so you keep placing more and more info here that still fails to support your position with the perception I am getting that you simply seek to attempt to intimidate with unsupported theory that leaves huge gaps in understanding to the avarage reader. Transulation- thread has become a "yawner" now and the car also appears sold. Obviously we are now both way off topic. I suggest giving this mess a rest as other people have things to sell You know my opinion. It has not changed and will not change. By now I think everyone knows who to find your website too. ![]() |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
This discussion is turning in to one of personal attacks. Although the information discussed has much merit and has allowed each reader to be fully informed, lets move on. I think we all have formed opinions and no information that has been presented will change anyones.
![]()
__________________
Steve Shauger The Supercar Registry www.yenko.net or www.thesupercarregistry.com Vintage Certification™ , Providing Recognition to Unrestored Muscle Cars. Website: www.vintagecertification.com |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
With the Gibb novas there is around 50 cars between each VIN# There is 4 different sets of body #s. But the thing I found out is some of the early body #s are on later VINed cars. I thought for a long time that the 4 body #s where related to the 4 colors of the cars. One car showed up that proved that wrong. 20 years of study these cars and still dont know how they were done??
AS the saying goes the more you know the less you know.
__________________
Jake is my grandson!! |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
[ QUOTE ]
With the Gibb novas there is around 50 cars between each VIN# There is 4 different sets of body #s. But the thing I found out is some of the early body #s are on later VINed cars. I thought for a long time that the 4 body #s where related to the 4 colors of the cars. One car showed up that proved that wrong. 20 years of study these cars and still dont know how they were done?? AS the saying goes the more you know the less you know. [/ QUOTE ] Ditto on the Deuces! I came late to this party, interesting read.
__________________
Marlin 70 Yenko Nova-350/360, 4speed M21, 4.10 Posi (Daddy's Ride) 69 SS Nova-396/375hp, 4speed M20, 3.55 Posi (Benjamin's Ride) 67 RS Camaro-327/250hp, 2speed Glide, & 3.08 Open (Danny's Ride) |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
Ditto on the Deuces! I came late to this party, interesting read. [/ QUOTE ] I don't know much about 68 Nova's. The 69+ body numbers are confirmation #'s. The guy entering the data would enter the cars that were optioned the same at the same time. For each car ordered, a confirmation # would be received. It could be the computer system or it could be operator error, but sometimes one in a group was missed, kicked back, or maybe the order was hung up in the computer for a few minutes. However it happened, that order would then drop in the midst of the next group of cars. The scheduler would schedule them in what ever order he deemed. Add in the possible holdups in the body shop. So for a given batch of cars, relative to the VIN, the body #'s may both up or go down or bounce around. ![]()
__________________
Kurt S - CRG |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
I knew this thread would blow past 100 posts!
What about the JL8 cars..did they receive TT's and wait on parts and VIN's or were they tight? |
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
[ QUOTE ]
With the Gibb novas there is around 50 cars between each VIN# There is 4 different sets of body #s. But the thing I found out is some of the early body #s are on later VINed cars. I thought for a long time that the 4 body #s where related to the 4 colors of the cars. One car showed up that proved that wrong. 20 years of study these cars and still dont know how they were done?? AS the saying goes the more you know the less you know. [/ QUOTE ] Exactly Kim... a closed mind is an ignorant mind... none of us know everything and to go into these discussions thinking that we do know everything is ludicrous. There is more and more information uncovered every year and like you said... "the more I think I know... the more I realize I am just scratching the surface!
__________________
~JAG~ NCRS#65120 68 GTO HO 4 spd Alpine Blue /Parchment 2 owner car #21783 71 Corvette LT1 45k miles Orig paint - Brandshatch Green - National Top Flight - last known 71 LT1 built. 71 Corvette LT1 42k miles Original paint - Black - black leather - only black LT1 known to exist. NUMEROUS Lemans blue Camaros, Monza Red and Daytona Yellow Corvettes & a Chevelle or two... Survivors, restored cars, & other photos https://picasaweb.google.com/lh/myphotos |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
70copo . What I have derived from all of this is that you seem to have it in for the CRG. You seem to come into this thread baiting William by asking 50 questions and taunting for answers like a attorney at a trial. Supress free speech ? Damage control ? If you don't believe what I am saying about how you are coming across, ask someone you are sure is neutral from outside this forum. I personally don't think you are proving any points because of the argumentative way you are trying to make them. If anything it makes you harder to believe.
|
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
Charlie,
You need to read the above reply to Kurt. True or not? I have a right to stick up for what I think is true. No rules broken. I am sure you ripped William for his Mild obscene remark he made to me in a previous post that I did not deserve at all. |