Dedicated to the Promotion and Preservation of American Muscle Cars, Dealer built Supercars and COPO cars. |
|
#13
09-10-2007, 03:44 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 73 MOTION CAMARO
Looking at the 3rd pic (rear shot), It looks to still have the inboard "T" bolts in place. I would have guessed part of the suspension upgrade would replace those w/ U bolts along with additional welding to the rear axle tubes. Is there any evidence of that?
Is it a 396 or 454? Both are listed above. Is the 5th digit of the VIN a "T"? That would indicate that she was, at the very least, born a Z-28. If you have any more pics feel free to send them my way for posting Jon. Nice looking ride.
__________________
-=Mark Holman=- 
|
|
#14
09-10-2007, 05:04 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 73 MOTION CAMARO
If this is a Motion modified Z28 would it be one of the Motion "Z30" cars?
|
|
#15
09-10-2007, 05:09 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 73 MOTION CAMARO
I thought all Motion Phase III Conversions used 12 Bolt Rears?
__________________
Click to visit the Nickey Performance Facebook--> 
|
|
#16
09-10-2007, 05:51 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 73 MOTION CAMARO
[ QUOTE ]
I thought all Motion Phase III Conversions used 12 Bolt Rears? [/ QUOTE ] No, my '71 LS-6 powered BM Camaro had the original 10 bolt w/4.10's.
|
Linear Mode
