![]() Dedicated to the Promotion and Preservation of American Muscle Cars, Dealer built Supercars and COPO cars. |
|
Register | Album Gallery | Thread Gallery | FAQ | Community | Calendar | Become a Paid Member | Today's Posts | Search |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I have seen 2 unmolested original car and there is no caulking what so ever near the rivits. Both LA cars
__________________
1968 LOS Rallye Green Z28 |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Maxx, If it's possible can you show your tag from from your 1821 mile unrestored 1969 z28/rs.
Thanks |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
Maxx, If it's possible can you show your tag from from your 1821 mile unrestored 1969 z28/rs. Thanks [/ QUOTE ] |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Attachment shown above is the only shot I have at this time. Why would a 69 car have a front spoiler and not a rear spoiler? Were all 1969 camaro standard front grilles painted silver by the factory??
![]() |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
Attachment shown above is the only shot I have at this time. Why would a 69 car have a front spoiler and not a rear spoiler? Were all 1969 camaro standard front grilles painted silver by the factory?? ![]() [/ QUOTE ] All non RS cars got silver grille except for SS equipped cars which received black. All RS equipped cars received black grilles except for those painted black, which received silver grilles. Z28's followed the above protocol as well: Standard Z silver grille RS/Z Black grille RS/Z painted black would have a silver grille
__________________
Steve Shauger The Supercar Registry www.yenko.net Vintage Certification™ , Providing Recognition to Unrestored Muscle Cars. Website: www.vintagecertification.com |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The much discussed Canadian L89 Camaro here does not appear to have come through Belmont Chev when it was new... It was not ordered by Belmont Chev.
__________________
Charles |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
How can you say that when the GM docs posted on the first page say otherwise?
__________________
It is impossible to certify a COPO or Z/28 as authentic without verifying that it is not a rebody... |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
If all is truly genuine w/ this car aside from the Cowl Tag, OK great...a real L89 w/ Canadian docs that for whatever reason needed a repop tag?.
The part I can't help but think of and let me be clear I'm only surmising the following as a 'possible situation' for any car...but think of what could result if someone stumbled across a known Canadian L89 Vin or maybe even the L89 option noted on one of the microfish copy pages GM Vintage Services used to give out when documenting a single vehicle?. (The microfish pages they used to give out showed a couple dozen cars besides the car being documented and included the Vin also options shipped w/ it). So if someone did happen to find or spot a Vin w/ the L89 option but didn't have the car, the temptation to 'reverse-resto' a car could be a reality?. Obviously a rebody w/ repop tags including Cowl and Vin tag would be necessary...so depending on what the tag results were, viewing the stampings and hidden Vins would be the next step on any car these thoughts were applied to?. Again, I want to be specific that I'm only surmising these situations and not necessarily considering the vehicle in this thread or any other specific cars being suspect...only thinking of the possibilities of how it could all take place especially here in Ontario Canada where it's simple to obtain a title to the Vin of your choice w/ records that don't reach back quite far enough, 'bulletproof' Canadian Vintage Service documents available...all mixed w/ today's world of rebodys, restamps and repop tags!?. ~ Pete ![]() |
#9
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
good point. So you are saying this could be an indication of a "fabricated" car?. I think that would be a pretty stupid move by the person who did such a thing, all it would take is a check of the hidden vin, and what if the original car popped up somewhere? yikes...
__________________
2012 ZL1 black M6 1968 L36 4 spd Biscayne 1957 270 hp Corvette |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Please let this not get out of hand. So far what we have is a L89 and a COPO that simply have repo trim tags and some inconsistencies in the history of the COPO.
|
![]() |
|
|