![]() Dedicated to the Promotion and Preservation of American Muscle Cars, Dealer built Supercars and COPO cars. |
|
Register | Album Gallery | Thread Gallery | FAQ | Community | Calendar | Become a Paid Member | Today's Posts | Search |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
Yes, I've seen the older 396 blocks go 4.25, in fact in early 1966 the 396 block # 3855961 was bored to a 427. [/ QUOTE ] It was my understanding that some early 396 blocks had thicker walls and as such were able to be bored to this extreme. Since the 402 was a 396 +0.030 anyway, aren't you already behind the 8-ball regarding cylinder wall thickness? Or, were the 402's cast with thicker walls to compensate for the overbore ( 402 vs. 396 ). Remember, the 3969854 block started life as a 396 ( late '69 production ), then morphed into the 402 in 1970. I would tend to believe that the cylinders wall thickness was not modified once 402 production came to be as this would have mandated a different part number. Steve
__________________
![]() |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I thought the Cxx coded 396 were actually 402's in the extended Camaro production year
|
![]() |
|
|