Go Back   The Supercar Registry > Dealer Specific Discussion > COPO - Canada


 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #4  
Old 08-14-2007, 10:32 PM
William William is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: New Berlin WI USA
Posts: 2,690
Thanks: 263
Thanked 3,002 Times in 834 Posts
Default Re: 427 engine options for 1969

First of all the L72 and ZL-1 were not RPOs. Any order for them was routed through Central Office for processing. Most Chevy dealers did not know [or care] of their existance.

The main reason there were no Camaro/Chevelle RPO 427 engine options was a GM Corporate Policy: no engine over 400 cubic inches allowed in cars less than full-size. I believe that was the reason Olds farmed out responsibility for the 455-powered '68-'69 Hurst Olds, which were installed by Olds.

There was a strongly worded Chevrolet Dealer Service Bulletin issued in '68 or '69 warning dealers of the possible business and legal consequences of modifying new cars including swapping engines not offered as an option.
__________________
Learning more and more about less and less...
Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 06:36 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.

O Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.