I know you guys will tell me like it is ..

[YENKO DEUCE REGISTRY]

[ QUOTE ]
Yenko Deuce-- Utter poppycock. Ballyhoo. Embellishment of magnanomous proportions.

How about undercoating? How about mudflaps? What about fiber optics? You're insane???!!!

[/ QUOTE ]

I have no idea what you are talking about with this post

[69LM1]

I *think* the thought was that I was talking about structural issues, and these were "add ons". I still don't see any differences on the bodies from fischer.

For example, could you have taken a 6banger off the line, and dropped all of the ZL1 stuff into it and had the same performance? I *think* the answer is yes, which was my point that it was the ZL1 (speaking in spreads from lowest performance camaros to highest) specific "changes" that made a ZL1 camaro special (or more so than)a 250 6 banger camaro. Thus, my argument that if the emphesis (big word! ) was on those ZL1 specific items, then it would have a couple of effects. 1, It would be hard to "clone" a car (X66, X33 etc) although far from impossible and 2, it would render these discussions about how many body panels are too much. Of course, all of the guys with those Z's without original drivelines would see a decrease in value, if this became reality. Those with verifiable original drivelines would see a major increase in value, as the available pool shrinks.

Just some thoughts and far from fleshed out.............

[Joe]

Steve ,
Ok i'll take that . My bad , I should have never used the word " REBODY "
I didn't know that term ment removing Vin numbers , thats not what i was intending to do .
Joe

[njsteve]

That "r-word" is one of those instant red flags that sets my little Barney Fife heart all a twitter. Like when I see Aunt Bee double parkin her Hudson in front of the fire hydrant. Gotta ticket her. Dont wanna do it, but it's my duty, Andy.