Battery toppers

[1969z280]

Steve:

David Griffiths from Legendary is the person who told me that they produce them at the same place they're making Shelby stuff. Just passin' it on.

Ed

[TDW]

[ QUOTE ]
Will there be any change with the cables etc, when i go to a top post from my current side set up?

John

[/ QUOTE ]

Yes. Both cable ends are different. You will need cables for top post specific battery.

[Johnny Horsepower]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Will there be any change with the cables etc, when i go to a top post from my current side set up?

John

[/ QUOTE ]


Yes. Both cable ends are different. You will need cables for top post specific battery.

[/ QUOTE ]

I realized how dumb my question was after i pushed enter. I am going to just go with a Delco 78 side terminal and save my repo R89 for the rare times when the car would be judged.

thanks to all

But i wish they would hurry up and make a topper for the R89

[Kurt S]

Actually, that would be a R79.
Unless something changed for 70, the normal (non-HD) batteries would have been side-post.
http://www.camaros.org/underhood.shtml#Batteries

[Johnny Horsepower]

[ QUOTE ]
Actually, that would be a R79.
Unless something changed for 70, the normal (non-HD) batteries would have been side-post.
http://www.camaros.org/underhood.shtml#Batteries

[/ QUOTE ]

I am at work, but i know my set up is correct for my 70Z and without standing in front it, i think its an R89.
Anyone, know if top posts were ever put in 70z s. I have heard early production cars had top posts.

Thanks,

John

[DarrenX33]

John I think it is R79 is correct as that is what is called out on my buildsheet for my 70 Camaro...

[Johnny Horsepower]

[ QUOTE ]
John I think it is R79 is correct as that is what is called out on my buildsheet for my 70 Camaro...

[/ QUOTE ]

I forgot to look yesterday, i am not used to a car being at home. But i think you are right as well.

Thanks