Go Back   The Supercar Registry > General Discussion > Other Muscle


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-06-2007, 05:49 AM
raw muscle cars raw muscle cars is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: maryland
Posts: 283
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default 1963 F85 215 V8

Saw this on E-bay, neat car 63 F85 Cutlass ? Cool engine read it was 10.25 comp all aluminum, 215 cui. Anyone know about these?
Richard

http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/ws/eBayIS...mMakeTrack=true
Reply With Quote
Click here to view all the pictures posted in this thread...
  #2  
Old 03-06-2007, 07:15 AM
TN2Lane TN2Lane is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 52
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default Re: 1963 F85 215 V8

The motor is a derivative of the Buick 215 of the same vintage. GM gave up on it before it's time and sold the tooling to Rover. It lives on today in Land Rovers and was used by a slew of smaller European makes.

Olds had a factory alcohol injected(!) turbocharger for this known as the Jetfire - even had a boost gauge on the console. The early F85s were pretty light, so it made for a peppy little package by standards of the day.

On the other hand, if GM had stuck with the 215, we'd probably never have seen a big block in an A body.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 03-06-2007, 09:01 AM
olredalert olredalert is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Marine City, Mi.
Posts: 9,377
Thanks: 32,542
Thanked 4,475 Times in 1,903 Posts
Default Re: 1963 F85 215 V8

-----You know, I was just looking that car over on E-B and theres something wrong under the hood that I cant quite put my finger on. For one, I think the Olds had a different aluminum motor with the same displacement possibly. Maybe the same block but different heads. At the very least the valve covers are the Buick 215 style on this Cutlass while the correct Olds 215s also had stamped steel covers but the had ribs stamped in them the full length of the cover. Take a look at the engine in the cute little 63 Cutlass convertable and you will see what I mean.........Bill S
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 03-06-2007, 04:43 PM
Bill Pritchard Bill Pritchard is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Valley of the Sun, AZ
Posts: 6,220
Thanks: 1,534
Thanked 1,834 Times in 880 Posts
Default Re: 1963 F85 215 V8

I am not familiar enough with those to know if the Buick & Olds motors were different or not

One thing I noticed is the mention of the 0-60 time of 14.5 seconds.....if that isn't a misprint, I don't think I'd be bragging about it
__________________
Bill Pritchard

73 Camaro RS Z28, L82, M20, C60
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 03-06-2007, 05:53 PM
442w30 442w30 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Gabba Gabba Hey! NYC
Posts: 2,531
Thanks: 219
Thanked 148 Times in 73 Posts
Default Re: 1963 F85 215 V8

I don't know what carb was in that road-tested car, but eve the turbo Jetfire was not that fast. I suspect turbo lag was a probem.

Also, wasn't it water-injected?
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 03-06-2007, 06:02 PM
PeteLeathersac's Avatar
PeteLeathersac PeteLeathersac is online now
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: O' Canada
Posts: 12,396
Thanks: 18,698
Thanked 5,689 Times in 2,416 Posts
Default Re: 1963 F85 215 V8

I always thought it was the same block w/ different heads/intake too and basically the engine that ended up in cars like the TR8...wasn't it the same one in the low production original MG-GT V8 too?.

~ Pete
__________________
I like real cars best...especially the REAL real ones!
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 03-06-2007, 06:29 PM
olredalert olredalert is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Marine City, Mi.
Posts: 9,377
Thanks: 32,542
Thanked 4,475 Times in 1,903 Posts
Default Re: 1963 F85 215 V8

------Those engines were even in Range Rovers for quite awhile. Man,,,were they slugs! Probably 5000lbs and only 215 cubes??? I went back and looked at the convertable and there are a bunch of differences between the two engine compartments. I think this car lost its original engine and someone dropped a Buick in it. The little convert is a very cool car by the way.........Bill S
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 03-07-2007, 01:51 AM
StriperSS StriperSS is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Victoria, BC, Canada
Posts: 1,028
Thanks: 245
Thanked 120 Times in 48 Posts
Default Re: 1963 F85 215 V8

I could be mistaken, but I believe it was an alcohol solution, and that you could get it from GM in a container with a part number. My Cutlass parts books are 64 + up so I can't look it up.

John
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 03-07-2007, 04:09 AM
olredalert olredalert is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Marine City, Mi.
Posts: 9,377
Thanks: 32,542
Thanked 4,475 Times in 1,903 Posts
Default Re: 1963 F85 215 V8

-------Yup, John,,,That stuff used to be referred to as "moose-milk". I had a low mile 1963 Jetfire a long time ago and an older longtime Olds mechanic referred to that stuff that way. I dont know the makeup of it but know it did contain alcohol along with other stuff........Bill S
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 03-09-2007, 05:55 PM
StriperSS StriperSS is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Victoria, BC, Canada
Posts: 1,028
Thanks: 245
Thanked 120 Times in 48 Posts
Default Re: 1963 F85 215 V8

Here's what one of those V8's is potentially good for.

http://www.speedsportlife.com/photop...offeetable.jpg

John
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 04:20 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.

O Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.