Dedicated to the Promotion and Preservation of American Muscle Cars, Dealer built Supercars and COPO cars. |
|
|||||||
| Register | Album Gallery | Thread Gallery | FAQ | Community | Calendar | Become a Paid Member | Today's Posts | Search |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
02-11-2007, 08:20 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: '70 Chevelle SS L78 Convt.
From a statistical POV, I think Carr's numbers make sense. But I also believe there are certain weights that must be applied to each vehicle. For one thing, I think the buyer of an El Camino has a lower propensity to be interested in an ultra-high performance vehicle. Hence, I believe the numbers for L78 El Caminos are much less.
|
|
#3
02-12-2007, 06:24 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: '70 Chevelle SS L78 Convt.
Good Point !but at least it's a start.
__________________
Lately into Beaumont SD's, 66,67,68 and 69 , including a 69 2 Dr Post Beaumont , an L78 2 Dr Post Chevelle LS6 Chevelle's, LS6 and L78 El Camino and Camaro fan ! Also 2 Cdn Documented COPO's, a COPO Camaro and COPO Chevelle Love GM Products
|
|
#4
02-12-2007, 07:12 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: '70 Chevelle SS L78 Convt.
How can it be a start? It just leads to misinformation.
If I were to use statistics for a Hemicuda convertible, I would think that all of 'em were red, dark green, yellow, and purple. Instead, there's 2 red ones, a purple one, two white ones, one or two black ones . . . you get the idea. But statistics would also suggest that the sample would not be enough to extrapolate numbers with a low rate of error.
|
|
|
|
Hybrid Mode
