Where is ZL-1 #66?

[JimM]

[ QUOTE ]
...I know nothing about the 66 car...

[/ QUOTE ]
Exactly... I find it HIGHLY unusual that no one here seems to "know anything about the #66 car" that they are willing to post.

[GRB]

Until somebody calls somebody else a fat pig face, I'm out of this one!

[M.W.C.C.]

Hello everyone. I just wanted to put my 2 cents in on this thread. I find it very coincidental that the owner of the so called "original drivetrain" for car #66 put his auction for all to view almost exactly a month before the Scottsdale auction. We all know the value of these rare pieces and this may all be an elaborate plan to discredit a true classic or get a huge chunk of money. As many of you have asked, "why has Bill not contacted either the owner of #66 or the authorities"?? Also, why did he list it on ebay of all places?? I personally believe it was for maximum exposure and he sure has achieved that.

If the car was destroyed then the state has to be notified and the title would reflect that PERIOD. Even though Bill says he tossed the car around like a piece of junk, even back in the 90's these cars had real value. If it was stollen, why was it not reported??

I don't know what to make of any of this, but if Bill truely has the original stuff, it needs to be reunited with the car. I do not believe that the whole story will ever be known. If I had car #66 then I would be at this guys front door right now. There's just too many scenarios and we all may be the fools. Without any more replies by voodoo, we're all just guessing.

I am a business owner and restorer of these fine Camaros for almost 20 yrs and have watched this hobby grow to the mega business that it has become. I frightens me too see a current trend of fakes, swapped tags, and restampings all for money. They are becoming rampit and as enthusiasts we need to secure the future of these classics. We need to keep this thread going and get to the bottom of this (if possible)as the implications are huge.

Thanks for listening to my 2 cents.

Nick @ M.W.C.C.

[nuch_ss396]

Well,

I do have to admit that I am a little confused over why
VoDoo responded early in this dabate, then went AWOL.

I do believe that it is put-up or shut-up time.

Where is VoDoo?
Where is the current owner of ZL-1 #66 ?
Anybody close in Waterburt, CT that can see these parts personally?
Does anyone here know if ZL-1 #66 is a "numbers matching" car?

Steve

[Rick H]

[ QUOTE ]
Where is VoDoo?

[/ QUOTE ]
Probably sitting at his computer reading all this and laughing his a$$ off.

[ QUOTE ]
Where is the current owner of ZL-1 #66 ?

[/ QUOTE ]
Probably sitting in his lawyers office NOT laughing one bit!

This guy's (vodoo) last post was 2 days ago. Obviously it was meant to ruffle feathers. Time to let it go.

Rick H.

[hvychev]

This hobby is beginning to suck. Maybe it is just in this end of it. I don't know......

[Lynn]

My notes from Dec. 1997 indicate #66 was owned by "BAR-JACKSON" at the time, which I must assume is Barrett Jackson.

I am making no accusations. Just trying to figure this out along with most of you guys. Bill's auction states;
"I have owned this car since the 80's, It was registered,insured, and taxed till 99."

That sure SEEMS to be at odds with my notes. Of course, if the car was in a pile somewhere, or thought to be in a pile, it could be possible. But why would you keep registering and INSURING a car that was in a pile? Again, not making accusations, just asking legitimate questions. I would like to see a clear pic of the VIN derivitive stamping on the side of the block. The one in the auction is pretty bad.

I don't know Bill and I don't know the current owner. If Bill does indeed have a river card to play, sure seems this would be the right time to play it.

[Motion Camaro]

[ QUOTE ]
This hobby is beginning to suck. Maybe it is just in this end of it. I don't know......

[/ QUOTE ]

<font color="blue">If I had #66, I would make it a full out G-Machine just to end this thread.

WHAT!?

Don't tempt me, I'll do it ...

OK, that's it ... where's that ad???

</font>