![]() Dedicated to the Promotion and Preservation of American Muscle Cars, Dealer built Supercars and COPO cars. |
|
Register | Album Gallery | Thread Gallery | FAQ | Community | Calendar | Become a Paid Member | Today's Posts | Search |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Joe,
The use of a 4-bolt block in place of a 2-bolt block is one thing. However, I'd like to know if this engine in question had a '6223 crank, dimpled rods, etc.. Also, of particular interest would be the piston domes. Rectangular port heads have larger combustion chamber volumes than those of the oval port heads ( 107cc's vs. 101cc's ). SHP piston domes are considerably higher, so I suspect they wouldn't fit in the oval port heads properly. Can you find out more about the rods & pistons? I'd like to know more. ![]() Knowing what we know today, I'm not at all surprised at a finding like this. If they needed a block to make production and a 2-bolt version wasn't available, they took what they could find. ![]() |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Come to think of it, I remember seeing something in the past
about the 1966 big blocks. I believe some 360hp 396 engines used 4-bolt blocks in some cases and GM sent a service bulletin to dealers alerting them to the fact that the piston domes were different and that care should be taken when replacing the short block assemblies as the SHP pistons would interfere with the oval port top ends. Anybody remember this? It may have been in Colvin's books. ![]()
__________________
![]() |
![]() |
|
|