Dedicated to the Promotion and Preservation of American Muscle Cars, Dealer built Supercars and COPO cars. |
|
|
|
#1
11-01-2006, 01:23 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 1967 Z/28
I know I am going to pay for this comment. What a beautiful car. Do you need a 1969 SS RS Camaro with a 540 to keep the Chevelle company?
Mark Sheppard 
|
|
#2
11-01-2006, 04:20 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 1967 Z/28
Good luck with the sale Joe! To be honest, I am very tempted to buy the car back given what I am seeing for sale for $90K these days - and especially since it has the original motor! Someone can enjoy this car as is for a number of years and still be OK after a freshening if they wanted
__________________
Mark
|
|
#3
11-01-2006, 05:51 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 1967 Z/28
[ QUOTE ]
I am not a '67 Z/28 expert nor do I play one on TV [/ QUOTE ]  ...I think it looks excellent in Butternut too.
__________________
 <span style="font-weight: bold"> (__{B}_____]]]]~~~~</span>Don't mess with old farts - age and treachery will always overcome youth and skill! Bullshit and brilliance only come with age and experience.
|
|
#4
11-01-2006, 07:18 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 1967 Z/28
Am I seeing that right. Motor V0703MO (July 3rd) Trim Tag 06E (Fifth week in June). Was the motor built after the body???
Paul
__________________
70 Camaro LA Z-28 03B Citrus Green LT-1 M-40 3.73's 69 Camaro X-77 Z-28 10C Cortez Silver M-21 3.73's Deluxe Project X - SOLD 69 Camaro X-77 Z-28 01B Garnet Red w/Black top, M-20 3.73 Deluxe Houndstooth
|
|
#5
11-01-2006, 08:05 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 1967 Z/28
The M and the O are at different angles,and at different heights than the V0703 and also to each other ,were the 67 Zs engine suffix hand stamped ??
|
|
#6
11-01-2006, 05:36 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 1967 Z/28
[ QUOTE ]
Am I seeing that right. Motor V0703MO (July 3rd) Trim Tag 06E (Fifth week in June). Was the motor built after the body??? According to MacNeish, this is correct and not uncommon, I had the same question. The pad stamping has been looked at by numerous, knowledgeable people and determined correct. As I said, this pad was the subject of a thread a few months ago when someone interested in the car posted a copy on the site, asking the same questions as 427king did. Paul [/ QUOTE ]
__________________
'70 L78 NOVA SS '77 Bronco
|
|
#7
11-01-2006, 05:40 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 1967 Z/28
There are numerous examples of the engine suffix being uneven with '67 Z's. In fact, I can't say that I have ever seen a real stamping that wasn't a little off. Jerry's book shows a couple of examples...
__________________
Mark
|
|
#8
11-01-2006, 06:47 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 1967 Z/28
Can someone post the prior stamp thread mentioned? Any known reason why the vin tag has a std pop rivet.
Looks like a cool car. Thanks,
__________________
Click to visit the Nickey Performance Facebook--> 
|
|
#9
11-01-2006, 07:00 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 1967 Z/28
Numerous examples of mixed rivets exist...the 10,000 mile unrestored '67 L78 that was discussed on this site a while ago has one standard and one rosette rivit also.
__________________
Mark
|
|
#10
11-01-2006, 07:10 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 1967 Z/28
Stefano,
I do not remeber which forum the previous thread was posted nor have I EVER had any luck searching the forums for previous topics! I did print the old thread and have it at home so will see if I can determine when/where the posting occured. I do have some recent pics of underneath, trunk and engine compartment if anyone wants more posted. I do not have a lift so underneath is hit and miss as far as quality.
__________________
'70 L78 NOVA SS '77 Bronco
|
Hybrid Mode
