Go Back   The Supercar Registry > Classified Section > Supercars/Musclecars-For Sale

Please note


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-27-2006, 12:59 AM
JHS JHS is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Rome, Georgia
Posts: 441
Thanks: 1
Thanked 4 Times in 3 Posts
Default Re: VIN vs. Fisher body # on cowl tag correlation???

I realize it is not a proof positive method but it sure was strange to find that my cars all fell within the parameter indicated, noting that only the last 3 digits of each set of numbers are used. Just wondered if this applied to other members cars?
__________________
'70 L78 NOVA SS
'77 Bronco
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 09-27-2006, 01:03 AM
Chevy454 Chevy454 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Alton, MO, USA
Posts: 11,923
Thanks: 0
Thanked 8 Times in 8 Posts
Default Re: VIN vs. Fisher body # on cowl tag correlation???

My guess is it's gonna be more of a coincidence thing as the VIN and body # were 2 different entities? Fyi: I grabbed a page of COPO Chevelle #s, and out of the 10 on that page, only 1 of them worked out to be within 100...
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 09-27-2006, 01:11 AM
Don_Lightfoot's Avatar
Don_Lightfoot Don_Lightfoot is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Kingston, Ontario
Posts: 1,193
Thanks: 0
Thanked 3 Times in 2 Posts
Default Re: VIN vs. Fisher body # on cowl tag correlation???

I also have not heard of any type of correlation between the two, wish there was. As a matter of interest the difference on my Chevelle is 76 (264 vs 188).
__________________
Specialized Chevrolet Decals
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 09-27-2006, 01:45 AM
Denis Denis is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Lake Tahoe (CA) and Vancouver (BC)
Posts: 1,247
Thanks: 1
Thanked 58 Times in 10 Posts
Default Re: VIN vs. Fisher body # on cowl tag correlation?

I think you should tell us about your 67 Z28...
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 09-27-2006, 03:52 PM
JHS JHS is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Rome, Georgia
Posts: 441
Thanks: 1
Thanked 4 Times in 3 Posts
Default Re: VIN vs. Fisher body # on cowl tag correlation?

[ QUOTE ]
I think you should tell us about your 67 Z28...

[/ QUOTE ]

Butternut Yellow w/std. black interior, black vinyl top, console w/out gauges, factory original drivetrain w/MO code block, restored in the mid to late 90s w/lacquer paint, just certified by MacNeish and car #170 in the registery. I meant to post this thread in the general discussion forum, sorry.
__________________
'70 L78 NOVA SS
'77 Bronco
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 09-27-2006, 07:20 PM
Verne_Frantz Verne_Frantz is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Central New Jersey
Posts: 3,793
Thanks: 34
Thanked 240 Times in 123 Posts
Default Re: VIN vs. Fisher body # on cowl tag correlation???

JHS,
It gets kind of complicated. If a plant is producing more than one model, such as coupe, convertible, sedan, etc., each body style will have it's own consecutive numbering from Fisher on the cowl tag. The VIN of course is assigned to a chassis in the order of final assembly, no matter which body style winds up on that chassis. There is a correllation of course, but not one where a "difference" in both numbers should be any certain value.
The best way to determine if one number agrees with the other would be to find a known original car built early in production and one late in production. Take the difference in body numbers and the difference in sequential VINs and plot both on the same time line. Then when you find a car with a VIN somewhere within that range, an approximate "expected" body number can be derived. You'd need to plot those production lines for each body style.
Again, it's only an approximation, since the rate of production of one style or another may vary, such as more convertibles in the Spring, etc.
Hope this helps...

Verne
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 09-27-2006, 07:47 PM
YENKO DEUCE REGISTRY's Avatar
YENKO DEUCE REGISTRY YENKO DEUCE REGISTRY is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: PA
Posts: 13,097
Thanks: 720
Thanked 360 Times in 144 Posts
Default Re: VIN vs. Fisher body # on cowl tag correlation???

[ QUOTE ]
JHS,
It gets kind of complicated. If a plant is producing more than one model, such as coupe, convertible, sedan, etc., each body style will have it's own consecutive numbering from Fisher on the cowl tag. The VIN of course is assigned to a chassis in the order of final assembly, no matter which body style winds up on that chassis. There is a correllation of course, but not one where a "difference" in both numbers should be any certain value.
The best way to determine if one number agrees with the other would be to find a known original car built early in production and one late in production. Take the difference in body numbers and the difference in sequential VINs and plot both on the same time line. Then when you find a car with a VIN somewhere within that range, an approximate "expected" body number can be derived. You'd need to plot those production lines for each body style.
Again, it's only an approximation, since the rate of production of one style or another may vary, such as more convertibles in the Spring, etc.
Hope this helps...

Verne

[/ QUOTE ]

Ditto, well said
__________________
Marlin
70 Yenko Nova-350/360, 4speed M21, 4.10 Posi (Daddy's Ride)
69 SS Nova-396/375hp, 4speed M20, 3.55 Posi (Benjamin's Ride)
67 RS Camaro-327/250hp, 2speed Glide, & 3.08 Open (Danny's Ride)
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 09-27-2006, 08:17 PM
JHS JHS is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Rome, Georgia
Posts: 441
Thanks: 1
Thanked 4 Times in 3 Posts
Default Re: VIN vs. Fisher body # on cowl tag correlation???

Thanks for the explanation, I have no knowledge as to how the production line process works so this was a good primer. I just thought it interesting that all of my vehicles fell within the 100 digit range. As I said, never thought of this as a difinitive way to prove a cars cowl tag authenticity but thought the members might beinterested in an old mechanics tale I heard. I am learning quite a bit about the hobby from you guys so thanks.
__________________
'70 L78 NOVA SS
'77 Bronco
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 09-27-2006, 10:12 PM
firstgenaddict's Avatar
firstgenaddict firstgenaddict is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Greenville, South Carolina
Posts: 5,596
Thanks: 161
Thanked 949 Times in 459 Posts
Default Re: VIN vs. Fisher body # on cowl tag correlation???

Here is a very good "Primer" on the complete process from order acceptance at Fisher all the way through final assembly...
http://www.camaros.org/assemblyprocess.shtml
__________________
~JAG~
NCRS#65120
68 GTO HO 4 spd Alpine Blue /Parchment 2 owner car
#21783 71 Corvette LT1 45k miles Orig paint - Brandshatch Green - National Top Flight - last known 71 LT1 built.
71 Corvette LT1 42k miles Original paint - Black - black leather - only black LT1 known to exist.
NUMEROUS Lemans blue Camaros,
Monza Red and Daytona Yellow Corvettes
& a Chevelle or two...
Survivors, restored cars, & other photos
https://picasaweb.google.com/lh/myphotos
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 09-27-2006, 11:54 PM
Kurt S Kurt S is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 3,106
Thanks: 2
Thanked 812 Times in 375 Posts
Default Re: VIN vs. Fisher body # on cowl tag correlation???

What Verne said is correct (assuming you compare the #'s from the same style code) for 68 and earlier. Starting in 69, the body # was the order confirmation #. The correlation to the VIN becomes much more vague.
See http://www.camaros.org/bodynumbering.shtml for more info.
__________________
Kurt S - CRG
Reply With Quote
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:20 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.

O Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.