Dedicated to the Promotion and Preservation of American Muscle Cars, Dealer built Supercars and COPO cars. |
|
|||||||
| Register | Album Gallery | Thread Gallery | FAQ | Community | Calendar | Become a Paid Member | Today's Posts | Search |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
Well, I guess history does repeat itself. Just like the lag between the original Mustang and the 1967 Camaro, we now see roughly the same lag between the "new" Mustang and the proposed 2009 Camaro. When will GM learn? [/ QUOTE ] Maybe the decision was to let the hoopla die down after the Challenger comes out, and not have to compete for the attention. ![]()
__________________
Rob 69 <font color="orange">HO</font> Z-28 |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
I don't think it would have made any difference otherwise.
GM missed the boat! |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
[ QUOTE ]
I don't think it would have made any difference otherwise. GM missed the boat! [/ QUOTE ] Ditto, the car looked a little bit nicer in person, but it's still ugly - and does not remind me of a 1st gen Camaro.
__________________
Marlin 70 Yenko Nova-350/360, 4speed M21, 4.10 Posi (Daddy's Ride) 69 SS Nova-396/375hp, 4speed M20, 3.55 Posi (Benjamin's Ride) 67 RS Camaro-327/250hp, 2speed Glide, & 3.08 Open (Danny's Ride) |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Same as it ever was..
Naturally all is forgiven with an LS7 option ![]() Odds of that happening? 20% Same as it ever was.. |
![]() |
|
|