![]() Dedicated to the Promotion and Preservation of American Muscle Cars, Dealer built Supercars and COPO cars. |
|
Register | Album Gallery | Thread Gallery | FAQ | Community | Calendar | Become a Paid Member | Today's Posts | Search |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Pete,
"Boxed rear arms"? Are you referring to the 4 link suspension used on the Chevelles and full sized cars? Not sure about those models. The rear stabalizer bar wasn't offered on the first generation Camaro, but all 67-69 Camaro's received a front stabalizer as standard equipment. The only real difference between the F41 and the "normal" suspension on the Camaro was that the ride was a little more "harsh" (for want of a better word). Stiffer springs and harder shocks made for more of a "truck feel" if you get my meaning. Not to that extent, but there was a noticable difference between the two suspension packages. Ed
__________________
Ed Bertrand 1968 RS/SS L-89 396/375 Convertible CRG Member |
|
|