Dedicated to the Promotion and Preservation of American Muscle Cars, Dealer built Supercars and COPO cars. |
|
|||||||
| Register | Album Gallery | Thread Gallery | FAQ | Community | Calendar | Become a Paid Member | Today's Posts | Search |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
The ACC tag was the standard trim tag for Chevy for several years.
68 Yenko and export Camaros used that tag because they did not meet the US specs on the standard 68 tag. I don't think that's a guess either. ![]()
__________________
Kurt S - CRG |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Not every 68' Yenko used that tag. The very early prototypes did not use that tag and were sold to customers as demos after there demo duties were completed...BKH
|
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Well, if the different trim tag was put on by Fisher Body because there was possibly a question of compliance, that would mean that 68 Yenko cars that have that trim tag are actual copo cars from GM and not motor swap cars done by Yenko Chevrolet.
May be another piece in the puzzle. ![]()
__________________
...................... John Brown This isn't rocket surgery..... |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
They were COPO's because of the 9737 COPO not because of a different engine.
|
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Does that mean the heavy duty suspension and a 140 mph speedometer could make a car non-compliant for federal standards?
__________________
...................... John Brown This isn't rocket surgery..... |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
[ QUOTE ]
Does that mean the heavy duty suspension and a 140 mph speedometer could make a car non-compliant for federal standards? [/ QUOTE ] No, which is exactly why i don't believe the magic mirror tag had anything to do with passing or not passing federal standards...as BKH stated, not all 68 Yenko's had the tag anyhow. I believe it was just a way the factory differentiated the Yenko cars from the rest of the SS396 cars when being built, just like the MV 396 engine code. Why would Chevrolet ship a car to a dealer to be sold to the public if it didn't meet federal standards?
__________________
Joe Barr |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
just like the MV 396 engine code. [/ QUOTE ] That would be a major drivetrain difference. Maybe the MV engine was not emissions tested? Me, I'm surprised at the whole 68 program......
__________________
Kurt S - CRG |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
Did Brian note if the 68's Yenko's without the Magic mirror tags had the 9737 package ?
|
![]() |
|
|