Go Back   The Supercar Registry > Dealer Specific Discussion > COPO - Canada


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #31  
Old 10-30-2005, 07:23 PM
Belair62 Belair62 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Suburban Chicago
Posts: 13,448
Thanks: 0
Thanked 14 Times in 11 Posts
Default Re: Would this car be considerd a COPO

Kind of interesting topic...Doesn't anyone have a buildsheet from a pacecar ? Do they list COPO numbers on them like the 427 cars and others ? ??? Phils spoiler has a COPO number...what do pacecars have ?
__________________
<span style="font-weight: bold"> (__{B}_____]]]]~~~~</span>
Don't mess with old farts - age and treachery will always overcome youth and skill! Bullshit and brilliance only come with age and experience.
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 10-30-2005, 11:20 PM
Jeff H Jeff H is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Ewing, NJ
Posts: 2,454
Thanks: 0
Thanked 80 Times in 24 Posts
Default Re: Would this car be considerd a COPO

Back to the original question he asked, PacecarJeff, what makes you think the car could have been built as a COPO order? I see the 80055 special GM account but I don't think that wouldn't require a COPO order. I see the special paint code as well and I have no idea if special paint would generate a COPO order. I would think somebody with a 67 Pacecar with original window sticker might be able to help. I see a window sticker for a 69 Z28 in Jerry's book that also lists the 1001HA Special Paint but no reference to COPO. But then the 9561 isn't mentioned as a COPO on the window sticker either. Your best bet is to contact Jim Mattison to see what his thoughts are since he was there back in the day.
__________________
69 Z28 JL8, #'s match - being restored
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 10-31-2005, 05:47 AM
Pacecarjeff's Avatar
Pacecarjeff Pacecarjeff is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Ft. Lauderdale, FL
Posts: 360
Thanks: 18
Thanked 23 Times in 8 Posts
Default Re: Would this car be considerd a COPO

[ QUOTE ]
Back to the original question he asked, PacecarJeff, what makes you think the car could have been built as a COPO order? I see the 80055 special GM account but I don't think that wouldn't require a COPO order.

[/ QUOTE ]

First of all, I want to thank the people who have PM'd me with very helpfull info, and support. Otherwise I would have just dropped the whole thing and moved on.

A few things lead me to believe this car is a special order.

So far, EVERY one of the Canadian Pace cars cars has a fleet code on the trim tag, except mine.

The last part of my trim tag info has a dash: 5BY-,
That is the same as EVERY single one of the known 67 Yenko 427 Cars.

Additionally, I believe that the Special duty "festival" 67 IPC's went through the COPO process for high quality control. And many if not all of the 67 Pace "dash" Cars may have gone to speed shops like Gibb or Harrell to have their engines Blueprinted for performance, as well as their suspensions, and rear ends inspected or upgraded.

If nothing else they were all pulled off the production line to be built and inspected by hand.

And most importantly, some of the very special (special order) cars may have even had 427's installed instead of the 396's.

It is well known that Yenco was "secretly" getting 427's delivered right from the factory. 425hp's as well as 410hp automatics?

Why wouldn't a GM executive be able to do that too, right along with a fleet order. Or, maybe this car was the ONE that was supposed to go to A.J.

It is just strange that there was a Canadian fleet order for 20 cars, and then 1 more made with no fleet code?

These are the questions I have.
I am not trying to intercept the Supercar or COPO name.

I just have found some really weird things about my car, and wanted some help sorting it out.

I thought that is what this site is supposed to be about.
I have owned this car for a long time. I am not trying to sell the car or inflate it's value. just want to learn as much as I can.

I think this car may have some historical significance.
If not, then that is fine, I just find this stuff very interesting.

Jeff
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 10-31-2005, 06:26 AM
camarojoe's Avatar
camarojoe camarojoe is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: PA
Posts: 5,305
Thanks: 237
Thanked 264 Times in 119 Posts
Default Re: Would this car be considerd a COPO

[ QUOTE ]
many if not all of the 67 Pace "dash" Cars may have gone to speed shops like Gibb or Harrell to have their engines Blueprinted for performance, as well as their suspensions, and rear ends inspected or upgraded.



[/ QUOTE ]

Are you saying Fred Gibb and Dick Harrell blueprinted 67 pace car engines and did suspension upgrades? If not, what shops "like" Gibb/Harrell did the upgrades? I didn't know this. A Dick Harrell prepared 67 pace car would be very cool, COPO or not.
__________________
Joe Barr
Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old 10-31-2005, 06:43 AM
Belair62 Belair62 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Suburban Chicago
Posts: 13,448
Thanks: 0
Thanked 14 Times in 11 Posts
Default Re: Would this car be considerd a COPO

[ QUOTE ]
I think this car may have some historical significance

[/ QUOTE ]
Seems to me it already has historical significance...just being a pacecar...finding out and digging for the other stuff is what makes it even more interesting...If these cars could only talk...
__________________
<span style="font-weight: bold"> (__{B}_____]]]]~~~~</span>
Don't mess with old farts - age and treachery will always overcome youth and skill! Bullshit and brilliance only come with age and experience.
Reply With Quote
  #36  
Old 10-31-2005, 06:45 AM
Jeff H Jeff H is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Ewing, NJ
Posts: 2,454
Thanks: 0
Thanked 80 Times in 24 Posts
Default Re: Would this car be considerd a COPO

I'm wondering where in paperwork you would find the COPO term mentioned. Do the 69 COPO 427 Canadian cars show the term COPO on the GM of Canada docs? I thought the "-" on the 67 Pace Car trim tags was to denote some sort of special paint(blue nose stripe). Thinking about this(and yes, this is a very informative thread) we know the 69 COPO's and the 68 COPO's exist, but has anyone ever seen a 67 Camaro COPO order? I'm sure they exist, but I can't think of any I've seen information about.
__________________
69 Z28 JL8, #'s match - being restored
Reply With Quote
  #37  
Old 10-31-2005, 06:49 AM
Steve Shauger's Avatar
Steve Shauger Steve Shauger is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 5,467
Thanks: 2,489
Thanked 8,460 Times in 1,716 Posts
Default Re: Would this car be considerd a COPO

Jeff, I thought the dash code was speculated to be the blue nose stripe. Where did the special modified pace cars info come from (any documentation) or is this information pure speculation.

Why do you believe IPC's may have been copo'd as well as fleet coded. Is there a thread on the pace car site on this topic, because I would be interested in this subject.
__________________
Steve Shauger
The Supercar Registry
www.yenko.net

Vintage Certification™ , Providing Recognition to Unrestored Muscle Cars. Website:
www.vintagecertification.com
Reply With Quote
  #38  
Old 10-31-2005, 07:24 AM
Pacecarjeff's Avatar
Pacecarjeff Pacecarjeff is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Ft. Lauderdale, FL
Posts: 360
Thanks: 18
Thanked 23 Times in 8 Posts
Default Re: Would this car be considerd a COPO

It was interesting to me that all the 67 Yenko 427's had the "dash" on their trim tag.
Couldn't belive that it was just a blue stripe.

Why would a 0-1 special paint car, need a second indicator to reflect a special paint accent.
Either it would have special paint or it wouldnt. The tag would't have to say it twice.

In 69 they used the -- "dash dash" to indicate the same thing. Either stripe delete, or special color.

I belive the the special -- paint code just made the paint operator look twice at the production order. kind of a double check thing. (It was special paint something - better check and see what it says.)

So if the Yenco cars all used the - in 67 to reflect the COPO engine modification, why wouldn't that mean the same thing with the Pace Cars?
None of the Yenko "dash" cars had special paint or trim.
Just Performance modifications.

At this point we don't even know for sure if the C-1 cars and the 0-1 cars were really the same color. Maybe they were different shades of white.

Chevrolet wanted to be sure there were no problems with their "Brand New Camaro", when the whole world was watching.

It only makes sense they would use all HiPo stuff for the Show cars. It is really too bad we don't have build sheets, cause that would solve the mystery.
Reply With Quote
  #39  
Old 10-31-2005, 02:54 PM
Steve Shauger's Avatar
Steve Shauger Steve Shauger is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 5,467
Thanks: 2,489
Thanked 8,460 Times in 1,716 Posts
Default Re: Would this car be considerd a COPO

67 Yenko cars were NOT copo cars. Most were SS350's with some of the later SS396 converted cars. Never heard of 67 beig copo's in anyform. Where did you uncover this info?

Here is my understanding on the pace cars:

0-1 was thought to be special prepared paint...possibly show finish. Only the festival cars have this designation.

The - in the 5 group was thought to be the non conforming blue nose stripe.

The above has not been definitively proven, but widely accepted.

The only pace cars that were specially prepped would be the the first two or three, that were used or backups to the actual pace car.

We seem to be going into the realm of stretching some facts. Please clarify your 67 Yenko info, one thing we don't want to do is spread incorrect information on this board as fact. Speculating is one thing stating it as fact is another...
__________________
Steve Shauger
The Supercar Registry
www.yenko.net

Vintage Certification™ , Providing Recognition to Unrestored Muscle Cars. Website:
www.vintagecertification.com
Reply With Quote
  #40  
Old 11-01-2005, 12:49 AM
1967Z28's Avatar
1967Z28 1967Z28 is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Golden Bear State, USA
Posts: 2,166
Thanks: 1,967
Thanked 1,366 Times in 515 Posts
Default Re: Would this car be considerd a COPO

Is it possible to see a picture of the cowl tag for the car in question? Neat, historical car regardless of whether it was ordered via the COPO system or not.

-Jon
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 02:09 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.

O Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.