![]() Dedicated to the Promotion and Preservation of American Muscle Cars, Dealer built Supercars and COPO cars. |
|
Register | Album Gallery | Thread Gallery | FAQ | Community | Calendar | Become a Paid Member | Today's Posts | Search |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Other pic he had...
__________________
Chavez Ravine |
#22
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I goofed on my pic selection...sorry!
![]() ![]()
__________________
Chavez Ravine |
#23
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
It's not illegal [/ QUOTE ] What is illegal under 18 USC 511 would be to take the VIN from that hulk and put it on one of those new repro bodies, no matter the reason. I am very familiar with this statute. ![]() |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Legally...how much of the car do you have to transfer (by percent or specific parts) to be legal?
__________________
![]() 72 SS 350 4spd Camaro 74 Z28 Automatic 80 Z28 4spd 94 Z28 Automatic |
#25
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
Legally...how much of the car do you have to transfer (by percent or specific parts) to be legal? [/ QUOTE ] You can sell any or all of the car and it's not a problem. Most State laws make it a crime to sell a VIN tag though, even with an accompanying title. The crime comes into play when you take the tag from one vehicle and place it on another. Heck, you can even take the VIN tag of one of those infamous missing ZL-1s and dance in the streets with it ![]() ![]() |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
--------While Im sure you are correct in what you have stated about the legalities, I wonder at what point one considers the sheet metal that has been stamped out and then welded together a car. I know this is wierd, but it seems somewhat similar to the point at which a fetus is deemed life. I know, I said it was wierd! Hope this isnt another Roe-VS-Wade on a smaller, less important scale, but I dont consider a bare complete body a car, although others might...........Bill S
|
#27
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Charley,
SPEED Channel had a special on SEMA and interviewed a guy at the show representing the 69 Camaro convertible body company. He said there was a temporary injunction which had been placed and was already lifted, because they misunderstood that he was producing complete cars instead of just bodies. His position is that he produces sheet metal parts like GoodMark. At least that's what I heard over the conversation in the room...I didn't catch his name or the name of his company. Anyone else catch the show? -Sam
__________________
![]() |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Yes,I saw that too.The quote seemed to be "without quarter panels ,it's not a car".That must be a simplification of what was discussed between Dynacorn and GM.Interesting segment in a program that was as informercial-like as anything I can think of.
|
#29
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
--------While Im sure you are correct in what you have stated about the legalities, I wonder at what point one considers the sheet metal that has been stamped out and then welded together a car. [/ QUOTE ] The issue is not about the car body, it's about placing a VIN tag from another car on that body. THAT is what is illegal. (Not withstanding any civil copyright issues GM may have with the trademarked design of the 69 Camaro) I think Dynacorn could avoid all legal problems by simply classifying their "item" as a 1/1 scale model of a 69 Camaro shell. ![]() |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
why would anyone even want to place the vin and trim plates from an original car to the new bodies?
|
![]() |
|
|