Go Back   The Supercar Registry > Dealer Specific Discussion > Baldwin-Motion Performance


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 05-14-2004, 11:20 AM
JChlupsa JChlupsa is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: KS
Posts: 7,627
Thanks: 0
Thanked 6 Times in 6 Posts
Default Re: 67 B-M Camaro

This might be true but GM did have an Orange in their truck colors for 67 and that could have been a special order paint.

http://autocolorlibrary.com/cgi-bin/...truck-pg01.jpg

Also notice that the color used for the School busses which some call Omaha Orange is called School Bus Chrome!!!
__________________
IF YOU DON'T STAND BEHIND OUR TROOPS,
PLEASE, FEEL FREE TO STAND IN FRONT OF THEM !!!
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 05-15-2004, 04:37 AM
LVCamaro LVCamaro is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Las Vegas, NV.
Posts: 3,366
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: 67 B-M Camaro

Omaha Orange was GMC truck color.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 05-15-2004, 08:47 AM
camarojoe's Avatar
camarojoe camarojoe is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: PA
Posts: 5,305
Thanks: 237
Thanked 264 Times in 119 Posts
Default Re: 67 B-M Camaro

...And hugger orange wasnt offered at all until 68.
__________________
Joe Barr
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 05-15-2004, 09:31 AM
Seattle Sam Seattle Sam is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Lynnwood, WA USA
Posts: 1,669
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: 67 B-M Camaro

Wasn't hugger a 69 color, not available in 68? I thought the story on the Dana car was the owner wanted an orange car and the Omaha Orange ("a truck color") was the only orange available.

http://corvettes-musclecars.com/cgi-...20Camaro%20427

-Sam
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 05-15-2004, 11:01 AM
camarojoe's Avatar
camarojoe camarojoe is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: PA
Posts: 5,305
Thanks: 237
Thanked 264 Times in 119 Posts
Default Re: 67 B-M Camaro

Yes, hugger orange was to be a 69 model year color, however, it was used in the 68 calender year. Definitely not in 67 though.
__________________
Joe Barr
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 09:24 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.

O Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.