Is a "Clone' better?

Home: Goto Homepage.
Subscribed: See all threads you’ve posted in or started.
Today's Posts: Posts made today. Bold = unread.
New Posts: Shows all unread posts since last visit.
New Thread: Newest threads by creation time.

Unreal · #1 05-09-2004, 03:54 AM

Wow

KLONECO · #2 05-09-2004, 08:22 AM

YES THEY ARE!!!...........and if a person enjoys em!........so be it!!!!!DO YOU HAVE A PROBLEM WITH THAT? yea I did not think so!!!( fake ss,z28,ls6's are everywhere!)ton's or them have sprouted up for years now .......all of a sudden it is an issue!

I BELIEVE IT IS A TRIBUTE TO THE SPORT ..THE LEGEND.... THE MUSCLE CAR GUYS! keeps another one out of the junkyard!

**Dave Rifkin** · #3 05-09-2004, 03:59 PM

I don't post here often but this is a subject I have an opinion on; first of all everyone needs to understand that not everyone can afford to own the real thing. If they choose to build, or buy, a clone so that they might enjoy the thrill of driving a representation of their dream car so be it. They aren't hurting anyone, at least until they try to sell the car as legitimate.
For myself, I would love to own any one of the cars owned by the members on this site but will never have that kind of money. So I just might have to build a clone of a Yenko Camaro or maybe a cloned Hertz Shelby. Either way, it will be for my enjoyment alone and if anyone has a problem with that it's their problem, not mine.

Dedicated to the Promotion and Preservation of American Muscle Cars, Dealer built Supercars and COPO cars.