Go Back   The Supercar Registry > General Discussion > Supercar/Musclecar Discussion


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old 05-06-2004, 09:21 AM
KLONECO KLONECO is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 294
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: Is a "Clone' better?

VERY WELL PUT..........MR. SHMIDT! those that need the parts should have them! those that buy them really should wake up!!!!!!!! the #'s matching components that are needed to maintain a #'s car should be left for those cars!!!!!! not wasted on .KLONES CLONES/ TRIBUTES OR Otherwise! but.....
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 05-06-2004, 09:31 AM
KLONECO KLONECO is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 294
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: Is a "Clone' better?

nothing I say will make any sense to the people here! they seem to take it all wrong!I just like to see the hobby carry on preserved! enjoyed!
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 05-06-2004, 10:39 AM
Z28DZ Z28DZ is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Elk Grove, CA
Posts: 424
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: Is a "Clone' better?

According to A. Colvin's "Chevy by the Numbers, the "512" block was being casted as early as Oct. 1968.

It appears to be a nice car. However, the reproed X code trim tag (on a LA car no less) and stamped engine/irans VIN's , plus the statements of "If you know a lot about Yenkos you would know that the back panel is black on early production cars the first 50 cars were built in Jan of 69. This clone is more correct than some true Yenko's & "69 Yenko all # matching clone this is the most correct Yenko you will ever see" just seriously irks me. It is a bunch of verbal crap strung together to try make a "something" out of a "nothing" This car is not a Yenko, never has been or ever will be a Yenko and the real fact is, the most correct Yenkos I have seen are "real" Yenkos - period; and I agree these parts would have been better served restoring a "real" Yenko/COPO back to its original state. But then heck, the "real" one wouldn't be as good as this fake
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 05-07-2004, 01:15 AM
Canucklehead Canucklehead is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Edmonton/Alberta/Canada
Posts: 854
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: Is a "Clone' better?

I agree with all of you, why waste the parts on just a camaro, maybe it should read "Clown" instead
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 05-07-2004, 03:59 AM
Belair62 Belair62 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Suburban Chicago
Posts: 13,448
Thanks: 0
Thanked 14 Times in 11 Posts
Default Re: Is a "Clone' better?

Makes sense to me Al !!!
__________________
<span style="font-weight: bold"> (__{B}_____]]]]~~~~</span>
Don't mess with old farts - age and treachery will always overcome youth and skill! Bullshit and brilliance only come with age and experience.
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 05-07-2004, 04:47 AM
hvychev hvychev is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Darien, IL
Posts: 3,668
Thanks: 0
Thanked 73 Times in 28 Posts
Default Re: Is a "Clone' better?

This is exactly what I am talking about! Look at this crap. It would be a cool car but had to be totally RUINED by adding the Deuce stripes!!! Where is my damn flame thrower!!!
Attached Images
 
__________________
Frank Magallon
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 05-07-2004, 05:03 AM
RichSchmidt RichSchmidt is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Northern NJ
Posts: 620
Thanks: 5
Thanked 43 Times in 29 Posts
Default Re: Is a "Clone' better?

If course everybody wants an original one,,but since just about every one of these cars is accounted for in some form or another,the only way to get the Yenko experiance is to either pay top dollar for one of the existing ones,or build one yourself.I know the owners of the last survivours would object to the fact that you can duplacte the original car except for the actual numbers,and somehow that makes their cars less valuable,but the fact is that not everybody wants the real deal.Some cant afford it,and others shouldnt be trusted with it.
Now lets put this into perspective.What would be a nicer car to have for the street if you had about 50 grand to spend?That clone camaro,or a real yenko copo car that has been in a barn for 30 years,but now has a dana 60 under the rear,an LS7 tunnel ramed engine under the glass nose and a doug nash 5 sped in it along with glass doors and a tub job?How about of the real deal car had no title and the owner told you flat out that he was the one who dumped the grenaded original 427 and 4 speed into the metal shredder at the scrap yard 30 years ago.Would the fact that it's VIN number appears on the registry of real COPO cars make it a better deal for the same price as the clone?Since about half of all original 69 COPO cars ended up as the example I described,and about half of all the correct survivous are actually rehabed race cars with restamped engines and questionable date codes on the rest of the parts,can you blame a guy for just wanting to build his own?
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 05-07-2004, 07:27 AM
Unreal Unreal is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Chattanooga, TN, USA
Posts: 1,335
Thanks: 1
Thanked 77 Times in 48 Posts
Default Re: Is a "Clone' better?

Hey Kloneco, don't eat anything. We need to preserve the food for those who are starving.
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 05-07-2004, 07:46 AM
camarojoe's Avatar
camarojoe camarojoe is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: PA
Posts: 5,305
Thanks: 237
Thanked 264 Times in 119 Posts
Default Re: Is a "Clone' better?

Rich, i understand 100% what you are saying... for years I had considered selling my fully restored, fully functional, running, driving Yenko Camaro clone to buy a basketcase "real" supercar of some sort that I would probably STILL not have enough money to buy outright, plus throw 1000's and 1000's of dollars worth of parts at, not to mention the YEARS of time and effort it would take me to ever get it to the condition the clone I would have sold was already! Sure, my car is not a real Yenko Camaro, but it wasn't easy or cheap to build it either. After years of hard work, its finished, and I can take it out and enjoy it any time i want to. There's alot to be said about that. I have a "real" Deuce now too, but I still enjoy my camaro, real or not.

Attached Images
 
__________________
Joe Barr
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 05-07-2004, 09:23 AM
427TJ's Avatar
427TJ 427TJ is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: PNW
Posts: 5,578
Thanks: 1,007
Thanked 293 Times in 163 Posts
Default Re: Is a "Clone' better?

Hey guys, I heard a funny one just this afternoon:

"Arguing on the Internet is like the Special Olympics--even if you win you're still retarded."

(No offense to retarded/mentally challenged/differently abled/learning disabled/ADD afflicted people or their family members or anyone else anywhere in any way. It's just a joke.)
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 03:16 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.

O Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.