Who agrees with me?

jg95z28 · #1 04-13-2004, 07:44 PM

Are you talking about back then... or now?

You do know they are working on a new Chevrolet Coupe for 2008... don't you?

**micky69396** · #2 04-13-2004, 08:00 PM

Sorry guys, no better Chevelles than the 69's

**MosportGreen66** · #3 04-13-2004, 08:05 PM

[ QUOTE ]
Sorry guys, no better Chevelles than the 69's

[/ QUOTE ]

Micky hit the nail on the head!

jg95z28 · #4 04-13-2004, 08:13 PM

Actually, I'm partial to the 66-67 design.

skierkaj · #5 04-13-2004, 08:42 PM

Boy you guys are no help at all!

I meant "back then" if they combined the two. I think that combo would look absolutely perfect.

**Salvatore** · #6 04-13-2004, 09:51 PM

But they didn't kid, so.....WHO cares!

DarrenX33 · #7 04-13-2004, 08:46 PM

Oh man there's going to be a fist fight.

**mhassett** · #8 04-13-2004, 10:57 PM

I AGREE with Micky and Dan.. '69 Chevelle is what I wanted when I was a Kid and couldn't have, mostly because of the insurance.
Mark

JoeG · #9 04-13-2004, 11:22 PM

I like them all, but I'm partial to the '69SS,because I had a '66 SS and the front area of the '69SS reminds me of the earlier Chevelle. By '69 the Chevelle SS had finally become an all around performance /handling package like the 442 and GTO--In My Humble Opinion--

**bkhpah** · #10 04-13-2004, 11:27 PM

All the Chevelle's from 65-72 have merit. But I like 1969 best followed by 1966. But then again thats my take...BKH

Dedicated to the Promotion and Preservation of American Muscle Cars, Dealer built Supercars and COPO cars.