Go Back   The Supercar Registry > General Discussion > Supercar/Musclecar Discussion


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-28-2003, 04:19 PM
SMGCO SMGCO is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 323
Thanks: 0
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Default Re: 2002 Motion Camaro, NOT

Thanks for your detailed explaination and candor Matt. I hope all this doesn't knock you off balance with what your currently working on.

Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 09-29-2003, 03:46 PM
AutoInsane AutoInsane is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Katy - TX
Posts: 942
Thanks: 41
Thanked 9 Times in 8 Posts
Default Re: 2002 Motion Camaro, NOT

I dont think it would be too tough for Joel to get some deposits for a true modern Motion Camaro!!

Can we get more details on the car Joel wanted to build?
__________________
Bill O'Brien

1974 Jeep CJ5 - 304 V8, Edelbrock Intake, Holley 650, MSD Ignition, Patriot Headers
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 09-30-2003, 02:39 PM
sYc sYc is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Alton, MO, USA
Posts: 8,578
Thanks: 3
Thanked 405 Times in 92 Posts
Default Re: 2002 Motion Camaro, NOT

427, supercharged w/nitrous. Some where in the range of 750 HP. In addition, special hood, wheels, spoiler, ground affects, with paint design in part by "Gary the Local Brush". As with most, if not all of Joel's cars, not for the faint of heart, either in performance or styling. [img]/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/biggthumpup.gif[/img]
__________________
Tom Clary
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10-01-2003, 01:12 AM
Belair62 Belair62 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Suburban Chicago
Posts: 13,448
Thanks: 0
Thanked 14 Times in 11 Posts
Default Re: 2002 Motion Camaro, NOT

Were they thinking of a 9" Ford in that thing ?
__________________
<span style="font-weight: bold"> (__{B}_____]]]]~~~~</span>
Don't mess with old farts - age and treachery will always overcome youth and skill! Bullshit and brilliance only come with age and experience.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 10-01-2003, 02:41 AM
55chevy 55chevy is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: https://t.me/pump_upp
Posts: 2,320
Thanks: 0
Thanked 9 Times in 6 Posts
Send a message via ICQ to 55chevy Send a message via AIM to 55chevy Send a message via Yahoo to 55chevy
Default Re: 2002 Motion Camaro, NOT

Doesn't sound like anything wrong with Joels ideas.. So what were the differences that led to this project falling apart? [img]/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/dunno.gif[/img]
__________________
https://t.me/pump_upp
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 10-01-2003, 09:02 PM
sYc sYc is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Alton, MO, USA
Posts: 8,578
Thanks: 3
Thanked 405 Times in 92 Posts
Default Re: 2002 Motion Camaro, NOT

Matt Berger was concerned with liablilty issues in regards to putting a supercharger/nitrous on a 600hp 427, and Matt Murphy and Joel had a difference of opinion on what/who's exterior pieces to use.

As for some of the other issues involved, and where things go from here, might be best if Dennis Barker chimed in here, as he was in charge of promoting, advertising and of course sales for the proposed new Motion car.
__________________
Tom Clary
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 04:37 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.

O Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.