Original vs Correct,, New Body Acceptable?

[Jeff H]

Obviously this discussion is looking for opinions on how people perceive these cars and their restorations. I'll say that in my opinion, there is a difference between a rebody and replacing welded metal like quarter panels. If you damaged your car back in 69, the dealer would replace the damaged panel and repaint the area to match. That has been an accepted practice for a long time. If you damaged the entire body, the car was totalled, you weren't given a new body to put all other parts on. Saving a rusted out or severly damaged body on a rare car is a difficult and expensive task and it helps preserve the history of these cars. We all know there are people doing rebodies and back-halving cars so they can make a buck. I won't buy one of these cars and I'm sure most of the people here wouldn't either. But I see no problem with replacing rusted or damaged panels or body parts. It's no different than replacing other maintenance items like radiator hoses, spark plug wires. But the way I see it, the body shell is the actual car that the VIN and title go with. I sure wish we could get some more people to add their thoughts to this discussion. I don't expect everyone to agree, but it always helps to hear other thoughts.