Go Back   The Supercar Registry > General Discussion > Supercar/Musclecar Discussion


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-29-2024, 11:59 PM
mnow987 mnow987 is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2024
Posts: 3
Thanks: 1
Thanked 6 Times in 2 Posts
Default 1969 Chevrolet Big Block 427/454 #3963512 Engine Block

I need some help finding out any more information on this block. Here is what i've gathered so far.
  • Casting Number: 3963512
  • Casting Date: May 26, 1969 (E269)
  • Assembly Date: July 9, 1969 (T079 stamping)
  • Markings: Includes "HI P R Pass," "5T," and "F7" casting marks
  • Main Caps: 4-bolt
  • Applications: Suitable for 427 or 454 high-performance builds. Correct for 1969 Chevrolet vehicles, including Corvette, Camaro, Chevelle, and El Camino.

Can anyone tell me anything more, how much these are worth, or if there is any other markings i should be looking for? Cannot find a partial Vin on any numbers on the deck. Good core for rebuild, no cracks or repairs observed, ready for machining.
Attached Images
           
Reply With Quote
Attachments - The Supercar Registry 20241229_185206534_iOS.jpg 20241229_185200751_iOS.jpg 20241229_185158926_iOS.jpg 20241229_185156438_iOS.jpg
O Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.
Click here to view all the pictures posted in this thread...
  #2  
Old 12-30-2024, 11:03 PM
jeffschevelle jeffschevelle is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Concord, NC
Posts: 404
Thanks: 3
Thanked 874 Times in 205 Posts
Default

Good find. I can't help on what it is worth, but am interested in the stamps (or lack thereof).

Has the block been decked? By 1969 any service replacement block should have a "CE" stamp up top.

The T079 stamp on the starter pad confirms it was a replacement fitted block (machined block with bearings installed and fitted pistons and rings with wrist pins included), or a "partial engine". Not a complete engine with intake and exhaust manifolds and all the tin.

The fitted block or partial engine stamp format in 66 and prior was T0123, which was easy to decode - January 23 in this example. But some time during the 67 model year (either at the beginning, or at least by 1/1/67) it changed to 017T format. I have seen suggestions that that means 017th day of the calendar year (with the only way to know the calendar year being based on the casting date). But I also have seen suggestions that it means January 67, with no exact day indicated. (Maybe they only built fitted blocks and partial engines on one day each month, so didn't need the day indicated in the stamp??). Unfortunately, every one I have ever seen made logical sense either way, until yours.

At some later point (probably when they started putting the CE stamp up top) the starter pad stamp changed to the T079 format like you have. I don't think that means July 9th, because these stamps (after 66) always have three digits and never four, so that would not work for July 10-31. (UNLESS they DID only build fitted blocks and partial engines on one day each month and it was always in the first 9 days?? That seems unlikely though.)

I also don't think in this case it would mean 079th day of the calendar year, since the casting date is E-23-9 which would be the 143rd day of 1969. I doubt that that block laid around at the Tonawanda plant unused until the 79th day of 1970 (2/19/1970).

So that makes me lean toward it just meaning July of 1969, with no exact day indicated. The CE stamp up top probably would have tied back to records at the plant to provide the exact assembly date if that were ever needed.
__________________
Jeff Helms
65 Z16 Survivor
65 Z16 drag car
66 Chevelle L78 unrestored
67 Chevelle L78 unrestored
67 Camaro SS350 Survivor
Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to jeffschevelle For This Useful Post:
big gear head (12-31-2024), dykstra (12-31-2024), fsc66 (01-01-2025), ruralrte66 (12-31-2024)
  #3  
Old 12-31-2024, 01:13 AM
daveg's Avatar
daveg daveg is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2024
Location: NW WI
Posts: 287
Thanks: 48
Thanked 435 Times in 124 Posts
Default

Isn't there some significance to the tall distributor tower?
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-31-2024, 04:50 PM
bcmiller bcmiller is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Nebraska
Posts: 165
Thanks: 18
Thanked 22 Times in 14 Posts
Default

T079 is July 1969. I am 99 percent sure of that.

bergie can you comment?
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 04:05 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.