![]() Dedicated to the Promotion and Preservation of American Muscle Cars, Dealer built Supercars and COPO cars. |
|
Register | Album Gallery | Thread Gallery | FAQ | Community | Calendar | Become a Paid Member | Today's Posts | Search |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Napa, you can also call these guys @ Modern Driveline. They have a T56 package to use behind the Mopar Hellephant motor that make 1000Hp and 950 Tq.
A Hellephant make quite a good more bit Hp and Tq then your 565, and the new Challengers are what 1000lbs heavier.
__________________
'58 Apache pick up restomodding with twin turbo 522 '78 Z28 4sp being restored '78 Z28 32,000 survivor, Og Yellow paint, AC. '70 W30 convert TRIBUTE '70 CANADIAN Nova SS396 L78 Pro Street '69 CANADIAN Nova SS 396/350 hp '67 CANADIAN Nova SS 427 10 sec. driver '66 CANADIAN Nova SS Race Car '69 FIREBIRD Tubbed Racecar '61 CANADIAN Pontiac Bubble top 409+/4sp (SOLD) '31 ALL STEEL Chevy P.U. GONE (EX-WIFES NOW) |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
A T56 would require a complete tunnel replacement. Given the extra height as well as the extra length necessary, That would interfere with the bench seat. That's a no go for me.
|
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to napa68 For This Useful Post: | ||
Arrowsmith (05-13-2025), big gear head (05-13-2025), cheveslakr (05-13-2025), dykstra (05-13-2025), olredalert (05-13-2025) |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Good point on the length Tim. On my '66 chevelle bench seat, the tunnel mod actually created a slight interference with the center of the seat frame. It's all the way back, since I'm 6'3", and it'll only get tighter moved forward. You're going about this in a comprehensive way, which so many don't. I used an LT1 T56, which added another cost being the $400 conversion flywheel. I was lucky enough to get the clutch master and line with my tranny. You'd also need a new driveline. The speedo is another issue, which is doable on a T56 magnum, but it's not on the standard LT1 based T56, which would necessitate a GPS conversion speedo.
|
The Following User Says Thank You to cheveslakr For This Useful Post: | ||
napa68 (05-13-2025) |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Once you've powershifted a faceplated trans you will never go back.
G-Force for the win at that power level. G101 or GF5R If synchros are necessary the GF3650 is the best fit for the tunnel and power level Slipper clutch is the key to not smashing teeth even at way lower power levels. All hardcore stuff but you get to keep the Man pedal !!
__________________
68 Acadian SS-350 auto/AC driver 70 Nova SS-396/375HP Bench Stick 72 Nova SS-350 5sp Mini Tubbed 67 Chevelle Conv. SS-427 clone 70 Chevelle SS-454 LS-5 M-22 |
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to L78_Nova For This Useful Post: | ||
cheveslakr (05-14-2025), napa68 (05-14-2025) |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
![]() |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I have one remaining thought in the back of my head about the combination in the Nova, and that revolves around Tracey. I have the unicorn of a wife that actually likes these types of cars, and wants to drive them. She could handle the 422 powered 67 Nova (600hp) I used to have, but also made it clear she was not a big fan of the ram rod when I had it in there. While this sounds kind of morbid, I wonder if something happened to me, which cars would she keep? She digs this Nova almost as much as I do. I did get a bit of a stink eye from her when I showed her the M23 with the Long "ram rod"
![]() She can certainly handle the TH400, and can handle a trans with synchro's. The faceplated thing, that may be where the line is. I have not had a problem with finding my way around synchro tranny's before, I just have not had a car at this power level. I also have to be honest with myself how often I am going to use the car at it's potential? |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
"I also have to be honest with myself how often I am going to use the car at it's potential?"
I feel this is the first, and biggest, question you need to come to terms with and work from that. Honestly ? I don't see you getting crazy and possibly crashing the car, so using the "potential" will be minimal. If the current engine is not easily and economically feasible to de-tune to a more un-beastly and manual transmission friendly state, pickle it and the TH and install a healthy big block and manual that fits the tunnel and will handle that power level. The only extra cost downside will be another driveshaft to handle 600 +/- hp, torque and critical speed of the rpm the shaft will encounter at the given red line of the engine. You'll always have the beast waiting in the corner for whatever the future holds. Good luck with your decision... ![]()
__________________
Mitch 1970 Chevelle SS 1966 Chevelle SS 1967 Camaro ss/rs 1938 Business coupe, street rod 2000 FXSTS, original owner, 13k miles |
The Following User Says Thank You to Too Many Projects For This Useful Post: | ||
napa68 (05-15-2025) |
#9
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
The better part of 800
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
![]()
__________________
Dave Dykstra 1968 Camaro Palomino Ivory/Ivy Gold interior -Delivered to Courtesy Chevrolet, Los Angeles, CA 2013 Corvette Grand Sport 60th Anniversary Edition Arctic White/Diamond Blue interior -Delivered to Bill Jacobs Chevrolet, Joliet, IL NCRS#66003 Speed has never killed anyone. Suddenly becoming stationary, that’s what gets you. – Jeremy Clarkson. Dykstra Motorsports |
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to dykstra For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
|
|