Go Back   The Supercar Registry > General Discussion > Technical & Restoration


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-12-2023, 05:02 AM
turbo69bird's Avatar
turbo69bird turbo69bird is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Here
Posts: 323
Thanks: 104
Thanked 644 Times in 158 Posts
Default

There’s a few things I don’t agree with in that article . One is it’s not formulated for low RPM that’s relative. Most lycoming engines run at WOT at 2700 ROM or less many 2100 ROMs on the take off roll. So what low RPM he’s taking about and what the High Rpm?

If it doesn’t last longer that’s news to the aviation and landscapers who use it specifically because it doesn’t gel up like regular fuels.
Also airplane engines have 7.0 to 7.9 to one compression in its most popular engines
MOR rating is only half the story as well when it comes to octane .
I’ve personally drained fuel from an airplane wing that sat for over 10 years that didn’t have a tinge of varnish smell or flakes to it.

Last edited by turbo69bird; 01-12-2023 at 05:17 AM.
Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to turbo69bird For This Useful Post:
69 Post Sedan (01-13-2023), dustinm (01-12-2023), mhm1966 (01-12-2023), olredalert (01-12-2023)
  #2  
Old 01-12-2023, 03:41 PM
L16pilot L16pilot is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Maryland
Posts: 447
Thanks: 557
Thanked 477 Times in 161 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by turbo69bird View Post
There’s a few things I don’t agree with in that article . One is it’s not formulated for low RPM that’s relative. Most lycoming engines run at WOT at 2700 ROM or less many 2100 ROMs on the take off roll. So what low RPM he’s taking about and what the High Rpm?

If it doesn’t last longer that’s news to the aviation and landscapers who use it specifically because it doesn’t gel up like regular fuels.
Also airplane engines have 7.0 to 7.9 to one compression in its most popular engines
MOR rating is only half the story as well when it comes to octane .
I’ve personally drained fuel from an airplane wing that sat for over 10 years that didn’t have a tinge of varnish smell or flakes to it.
Regarding the author's comment about 100LL not being formulated for low RPM, I think what needs to be considered is that when 100LL was created, Tetraethyl lead was the best option to increase the octane rating based on the technology available while meeting all other requirements of recip aviation engines. Your comment about typical GA aircraft engines is correct, (2700 rpm or less), but I think the other performance factors outweighed the operating RPM range during development.

Also, for me personally, Avgas provides other valuable advantages with the prime one being it does not "go bad" in engines/carburetors/fuel systems that sit for extended periods of time saving tons of time/money/effort/frustration. I for one am looking forward to mass distribution and availability of the new GAMI G100UL fuel which promises all the performance/characteristics of 100LL, but without the tetraethyl lead.
__________________
Steve Nuwer

1970 Z28, Norwood 03A, 48 48, 723 Int, M20, COO, 2021 Legends Platinum restored
1970 L78, Norwood 04C, 17 17, 711 Int, M21, COO, born-with drivetrain project.
1972 Z28, Norwood 11C project, born-with drivetrain, 26 26, 775, M20, CGG project
1970 Z28, Norwood 05C, 48 G, 720 Int, M21, COZ, Original Unrestored (SOLD)
www.2ndGenZ.com
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to L16pilot For This Useful Post:
dustinm (01-12-2023), mhm1966 (01-12-2023)
  #3  
Old 01-12-2023, 08:37 PM
turbo69bird's Avatar
turbo69bird turbo69bird is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Here
Posts: 323
Thanks: 104
Thanked 644 Times in 158 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by L16pilot View Post
Regarding the author's comment about 100LL not being formulated for low RPM, I think what needs to be considered is that when 100LL was created, Tetraethyl lead was the best option to increase the octane rating based on the technology available while meeting all other requirements of recip aviation engines. Your comment about typical GA aircraft engines is correct, (2700 rpm or less), but I think the other performance factors outweighed the operating RPM range during development.

Also, for me personally, Avgas provides other valuable advantages with the prime one being it does not "go bad" in engines/carburetors/fuel systems that sit for extended periods of time saving tons of time/money/effort/frustration. I for one am looking forward to mass distribution and availability of the new GAMI G100UL fuel which promises all the performance/characteristics of 100LL, but without the tetraethyl lead.
I agree with those point but previous author said that the 100ll didn’t have a longer shelf life.

Idk if I’m thrilled w the new fuel coming online personally promises promises, heard it before we heard that with ethanol being added to fuel it wouldn’t be any differnt then our fuel lines started disintegrating . That’s bad enough in my boat or my car but I don’t like to mess around w any changes in my airplane . It took some time to see the effects of ethanol too it wasn’t right away . I won’t be flying my kids for a while when the new fuel comes out that is all I know .
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 01-13-2023, 01:45 PM
L16pilot L16pilot is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Maryland
Posts: 447
Thanks: 557
Thanked 477 Times in 161 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by turbo69bird View Post
I agree with those point but previous author said that the 100ll didn’t have a longer shelf life.

Idk if I’m thrilled w the new fuel coming online personally promises promises, heard it before we heard that with ethanol being added to fuel it wouldn’t be any differnt then our fuel lines started disintegrating . That’s bad enough in my boat or my car but I don’t like to mess around w any changes in my airplane . It took some time to see the effects of ethanol too it wasn’t right away . I won’t be flying my kids for a while when the new fuel comes out that is all I know .
I agree with the shelf life issue as well. As for race gas, I have experience with VP, cannot recall exactly which formula, but it did show signs of going bad in an un-opened 5 gallon can within a couple of years...an experience I've never had with 100LL.

As for the new G100UL, all we have to go by is the extensive testing performed by GAMI which far exceeded the FAA's requirements. True, time will tell, but all indications are positive with no ill effects. Whether we like it or not, 100LL is on the EPA's radar as the single largest source of lead emissions into the atmosphere and once approved unleaded aviation gasoline becomes readily available, the EPA will move quick to ban 100LL.

Also, the video link you posted is excellent...never knew the history behind tetraethyl lead and CFCs....thanks!
__________________
Steve Nuwer

1970 Z28, Norwood 03A, 48 48, 723 Int, M20, COO, 2021 Legends Platinum restored
1970 L78, Norwood 04C, 17 17, 711 Int, M21, COO, born-with drivetrain project.
1972 Z28, Norwood 11C project, born-with drivetrain, 26 26, 775, M20, CGG project
1970 Z28, Norwood 05C, 48 G, 720 Int, M21, COZ, Original Unrestored (SOLD)
www.2ndGenZ.com
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:37 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.

O Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.