![]() Dedicated to the Promotion and Preservation of American Muscle Cars, Dealer built Supercars and COPO cars. |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
ok I am more of a Camaro guy working on this 68 and it just look off to me any good sources for the original style springs
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
The springs are the correct style, but are old and tired and not strong enough to hold the weight of the car level, or they wanted to raise the back for tire clearance or appearance, so someone prior put those risers under them.
A better idea of what you have and what you want to do would help. A profile pic of the car and it's stance would be good.
__________________
Mitch 1970 Chevelle SS 1966 Chevelle SS 1967 Camaro ss/rs 1938 Business coupe, street rod 2000 FXSTS, original owner, 13k miles |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
going back all stock original I guess we can try to remove the spacers and see if the car will have a better level stance this is how the car looked before taking it all apart for its restoration
|
The Following User Says Thank You to ALLZS For This Useful Post: | ||
PeteLeathersac (02-27-2022) |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Yep, all jacked up for tires and appearance. Removing the risers will drop it the same amount and it may sit too low then. New springs to correct that are cheap and readily available, once you get to that point...
![]()
__________________
Mitch 1970 Chevelle SS 1966 Chevelle SS 1967 Camaro ss/rs 1938 Business coupe, street rod 2000 FXSTS, original owner, 13k miles |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
ok I just ordered some moog 6319 rear springs thanks for all the input I last question did the springs use the rubber insulators or just the springs by them self
Last edited by ALLZS; 02-27-2022 at 01:58 PM. |
![]() |
|
|