![]() Dedicated to the Promotion and Preservation of American Muscle Cars, Dealer built Supercars and COPO cars. |
|
Register | Album Gallery | Thread Gallery | FAQ | Community | Calendar | Become a Paid Member | Today's Posts | Search |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
There are a few errors like the space-saver and the cowl seal, but otherwise seems like a pretty well-done car? Not exactly uncommon for the cowl tag to be replaced in older restorations, sadly.
Here are the block and trans. BV rear seems like the right date.
__________________
~Matt '69 Z/28 RS '77 F100 '83 FJ60 '10 WC50 ‘24 J250 |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Most get put on to either make a car what it isnt or because it was missing in the first place. Those driveline stampings look legit. I would say that hes lucky he found that original cowl tag. Body number is the same on both. I would like to see the pad stamping bare, but initial thought is that its good. I think that original cowl tag was on that car. What would be nice is to find a pic of it attached to the car pre restoration.
__________________
1969 Camaro RS/SS Azure Turquoise 1969 Camaro Z/28 Azure Turquoise 1984 Camaro z/28 L69 HO 5 speed 1984 Camaro z/28 zz4 conversion 1987 Monte Carlo SS original owner |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
There were different practices in the hobby 20 years ago that have thankfully changed (like the term "numbers-matching" that should really be retired for good, from back when you lost points if you didn't restamp your replacement block!).
__________________
~Matt '69 Z/28 RS '77 F100 '83 FJ60 '10 WC50 ‘24 J250 |
![]() |
|
|