1970 Monte Carlo assembly line photos

[SS427]

Also note the natural steel transmission crossmember. I see this a lot especially on Baltimore built Chevelles and Monte Carlos.

[Nasblu]

Also notice in the body drop picture of the blue Monte Carlo the driveshaft dampner attached to front yolk looks like a harmonic balancer only smaller. Also on the Cranberry Red body drop picture looks like the car has redline tires which I have never seen before on any of the 1970 Monte Carlo built sheet I have ever seen.

[John Brown]

Originally Posted by Nasblu

Also notice in the body drop picture of the blue Monte Carlo the driveshaft dampner attached to front yolk looks like a harmonic balancer only smaller.

Had that same type of yoke on my 67 Caprice. It was a 327/275 turbo 400 12 bolt combo.

[Nasblu]

Originally Posted by John Brown

Had that same type of yoke on my 67 Caprice. It was a 327/275 turbo 400 12 bolt combo.

I had a 1970 SS454 Monte Carlo that had the same drive shaft dampner as well. Looks weird the first time you see them. Also appears the Blue Monte may be a 12 bolt non Posi car and well as the red car. Don't see the Posi-Label on either of the trunk lids.

[Mr70]

Originally Posted by Nasblu

...Also on the Cranberry Red body drop picture looks like the car has redline tires which I have never seen before on any of the 1970 Monte Carlo built sheet I have ever seen.

My uncles Monte C. was delivered off the truck with Redlines.He paid extra for em.

[Nasblu]

Originally Posted by Mr70

My uncles Monte C. was delivered off the truck with Redlines.He paid extra for em.

Nice!! What color was his Monte. Back then almost anything was possible if you wanted to pay for it.

[Keith Seymore]

Originally Posted by Nasblu

Also notice in the body drop picture of the blue Monte Carlo the driveshaft dampner attached to front yolk looks like a harmonic balancer only smaller. Also on the Cranberry Red body drop picture looks like the car has redline tires which I have never seen before on any of the 1970 Monte Carlo built sheet I have ever seen.

Good eye.

You may already know but that is to control rear axle whine (as a result of "non conjugal meshing action" of the ring an pinion). The resulting disturbance is transmitted up the driveshaft, causing it to wind up and relax like a rubber band, the order of the disturbance being commensurate with the number of teeth on the pinion gear. The damper is tuned to attack the resonant frequency of the shaft. You can put them on the rear axle companion flange as well, but they are not as effective because the amplitude of the disturbance is bigger the farther forward you go.

We used a lot of those on the old Astro/Safari vans, and on GMT400 pickups with the aluminum one piece shafts.

K

[Nasblu]

Originally Posted by Keith Seymore

Good eye.

You may already know but that is to control rear axle whine (as a result of "non conjugal meshing action" of the ring an pinion). The resulting disturbance is transmitted up the driveshaft, causing it to wind up and relax like a rubber band, the order of the disturbance being commensurate with the number of teeth on the pinion gear. The damper is tuned to attack the resonant frequency of the shaft. You can put them on the rear axle companion flange as well, but they are not as effective because the amplitude of the disturbance is bigger the farther forward you go.

We used a lot of those on the old Astro/Safari vans, and on GMT400 pickups with the aluminum one piece shafts.

K

I had a feeling that was its intended purpose but was never 100%. Thanks for for the explanation.

[Nasblu]

More Flint Production.

[Kurt S]

Originally Posted by Keith Seymore

You may already know but that is to control rear axle whine (as a result of "non conjugal meshing action" of the ring an pinion).

We used a lot of those on the old Astro/Safari vans, and on GMT400 pickups with the aluminum one piece shafts.

Why is it only a problem on some carlines? Is it an axle design issue or something else?