![]() Dedicated to the Promotion and Preservation of American Muscle Cars, Dealer built Supercars and COPO cars. |
#41
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Lynn</div><div class="ubbcode-body">From the assy manual for 1969 Camaro (don't know about Chevelle or 67-68 Camaro)
3950356 is for RPO M20 with L48, L34, L35, LM1 3946797 is for RPO M20 with Z28 & L78 3950316 is for RPO M21 with L34 3946798 is for RPO M21 with Z28 and L78 3950318 is for RPO M22 with Z28 and L78 Evidently, from this and from the RPO spreadsheet file in pdf available at camros.org, you could not order a close ratio (M21 or M22) unless you had L34 (M21 only) or Z/28 or L78. Now, for another question: Why is there a different tag number for the M20 behind a Z/28 or L78 as opposed to the one behind an L48 engine? They would be identical outside dimensions. The Z and the L48 would have identical shifters and brackets. Was there anything internally different between a Z/28 M20 and the regular small block SS M20? There had to be something different about these transmissions to warrant different tags. Maybe the standard rear gear ratio? </div></div>I don't think they had identical shifters.I don't think they had identical shifters. One would have had a Hurst and the other a Muncie. |
#42
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
All the four speeds in 69 got the hurst shifter.
I believe the answer to the question was submitted by crash: "Different speedo gears on the main shaft..." Crash The Z and L78 would likely have the lower rear axle dictating different speedo gears to at least get close on the speedo.
__________________
Don't believe everything you read on the internet ... Ben Franklin |
#43
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
12B641197 Thanks.
__________________
1969 RS 427 COPO tribute. 1969 SS/RS 396 4 speed 1971 coupe TH350 4 Seasons A/C second owner |
#44
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I noticed above that "<span style="font-style: italic"><span style="font-weight: bold"><span style="font-size: 11pt">3950316</span></span> is for RPO M21 with L34</span>" but I have the same tag on an M21 for a low mile L78 (4.10 rear) car. Would that be possible?
__________________
Sam... ![]() |
#45
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Calling all trans tag gurus.....(see above). Thanks!
__________________
Sam... ![]() |
#46
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
An anomaly [img]<<GRAEMLIN_URL>>/dunno.gif[/img] why did they bother with a tag for L34 and L78 ? No differance in the M21, right ?
Mike |
#47
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Mikey, I agree. I don't understand why there would be a different tag (and for that matter the trans construction) for a L34 vs L78 engine in front of an M21. Referenced car is original engine, tranny, and rear with owner history and multiple dealer and factory docs. What could matter (as far as differentiating M21 variants on the assembly line) is the speedo gear wrt the rear axle ratio.
__________________
Sam... ![]() |
#48
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
There are 3 different speedometer drive gears used on the tail shaft in the muncies. The rear axle ratio will determine which one is used. That is probably why the numbers differ. If a speedo reducer adapter was used that may also reduce the number of different tags that were needed. Here is where I found the information, http://home.comcast.net/~chevelleengineer/speedo.htm it could come in handy. Clint
|
#49
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
OK so what is 3968012WM ?
__________________
1968 Nova SS 1970 Camaro Z28 1987 Buick GN 1975 Trans Am 1972 Blazer 1968 Ford Ranger 1964 Ford short step 1929 Ford Coupe 1931 Ford Coupe 1986 GMC Wrangler 4X4 |
#50
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Furback</div><div class="ubbcode-body">OK so what is 3968012WM ? </div></div>
I believe its for a 1970 M22 application.
__________________
Steve Shauger The Supercar Registry www.yenko.net Vintage Certification™ , Providing Recognition to Unrestored Muscle Cars. Website: www.vintagecertification.com |
![]() |
|
|