Dedicated to the Promotion and Preservation of American Muscle Cars, Dealer built Supercars and COPO cars. |
|
|||||||
| Register | Album Gallery | Thread Gallery | FAQ | Community | Calendar | Become a Paid Member | Today's Posts | Search |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
05-26-2013, 08:45 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Is "stance" important?
This 69 is one of my favorites. I think the stance is dead on-love the up in the air look-front and rear with a slight rake. Cragars are 15x8 reversed(deep dish) rear and 14x6 front with L60-15 rear and E78-14 front.
|
|
#2
05-26-2013, 11:19 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Is "stance" important?
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: whitetop</div><div class="ubbcode-body">This 69 is one of my favorites. I think the stance is dead on-love the up in the air look-front and rear with a slight rake. Cragars are 15x8 reversed(deep dish) rear and 14x6 front with L60-15 rear and E78-14 front. </div></div>
PERFECT.
__________________
1968 Camaro Ex-ISCA Show Car - Sold  On The Lookout For My Next Classic... John 10:30
|
|
|
|
Hybrid Mode
