Is "stance" important?

[vince]

awesome thread....

[whitetop]

WOW Vince..as everyone else has said this car just &quot;reeks&quot; (in a good way) the late 1970's look and stance...very clean car..<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: vince</div><div class="ubbcode-body">





</div></div>

[Verne_Frantz]

This is from about 1979 at the E-Town Car Show. This is stock ride height with optional HD front coils and 15&quot; ET mags.



Before the mags, 1962


I kinda like it with the nose up, but there's no engine in it now.....

Verne [img]<<GRAEMLIN_URL>>/biggthumpup.gif[/img]

[mockingbird812]

<span style="font-size: 23pt"> Verne.......... [img]<<GRAEMLIN_URL>>/shocked.gif[/img] </span> [img]<<GRAEMLIN_URL>>/worship.gif[/img] [img]<<GRAEMLIN_URL>>/worship.gif[/img] [img]<<GRAEMLIN_URL>>/worship.gif[/img]

[whitetop]

Verne
I love chrome reverse without hubcaps....that whole American Graffiti look..

[Verne_Frantz]

The wheels on the front were just there as rollers because the others on the mags were flat when I got the car. I still have the tires though. Never thought I'd use them, but it sure would save me some bucks and bring back the old look. Those chrome wheels aren't reverses. They're actually optional factory 14x6s from '64 (yeah, Chevy actually did that)
Verne [img]<<GRAEMLIN_URL>>/biggthumpup.gif[/img]

How'd you like to have to change both front tires in this garage just to get the car out???

I did

[img]<<GRAEMLIN_URL>>/rolleyes.gif[/img]

[vince]

[quote=whitetop]WOW Vince..as everyone else has said this car just &quot;reeks&quot; (in a good way) the late 1970's look and stance...very clean car..[quote=vince]


thank you for the compliment whitetop.

verne frantze those pics and that car are the tits....love that car.