Dedicated to the Promotion and Preservation of American Muscle Cars, Dealer built Supercars and COPO cars. |
|
|||||||
| Register | Album Gallery | Thread Gallery | FAQ | Community | Calendar | Become a Paid Member | Today's Posts | Search |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#195
03-29-2013, 01:16 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Is "stance" important?
Juan:
Very cool. Especially the one next to Dick Landy's car. Noticed the front appears a bit lower on your car in pic one vs pic 3. That is one thing I always envied about the mopars. You want to change the front height a bit, just turn the old torsion bar adjusters. Was also very convenient back when I did alignment work in the 70's to get the trim height perfect from side to side.
__________________
Don't believe everything you read on the internet ... Ben Franklin 
|
|
#196
03-29-2013, 02:00 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Is "stance" important?
Wow, one of the best threads yet. So many great ones, I can't pick a favorite.
Although, of the last few pages, El Hemi and those two 67/68 Impala SS427's are just killer, but as stated, there are just so many great looking ones it's hard to narrow down favorites.
__________________
1968 Camaro Ex-ISCA Show Car John 10:30
|
|
#198
03-29-2013, 04:26 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Is "stance" important?
Think of it this way..........you get one for free or none.
I would be sitting in a red bench seat looking out over two black "power bulges". Ryan
__________________
 1969 Beaumont 350 Auto White Sold 1969 Beaumont 307 Auto Green Sold 1969 Chevelle SS 396-L35 Auto Blue Sold 1969 Oldsmobile Cutlass 'S' Sports Coupe W31
|
|
|
|
[/img]
Linear Mode
