![]() Dedicated to the Promotion and Preservation of American Muscle Cars, Dealer built Supercars and COPO cars. |
|
Register | Album Gallery | Thread Gallery | FAQ | Community | Calendar | Become a Paid Member | Today's Posts | Search |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: VintageMusclecar</div><div class="ubbcode-body">The 496 in my Chevelle has 11.2-1 compression with square port closed chamber heads, and runs perfectly on 92 octane. The key(s) to making it work are 1) cam timing (needs to bleed off some cylinder pressure @ lower rpm), keeping the engine coolant temps ~160°-170°, and a nice, conservative timing curve--in this instance, 14° initial and 36° total, but it doesn't come in fully until ~4000 rpm. (no vacuum advance either)
FWIW, YMMV. </div></div> Tell me more.... 1) Can you elaborate on the cam timing? 2) Please provide more detail about your experience with the cam. Thanks!
__________________
69 COPO Camaro |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I religously run a mix of AVGAS and 93, no other additives. The L78 actually runs better on a 100LL and 93 mix then all Avgas. I keep 5-10 gallons of it on hand and dump some in before heading to Sunoco. I have all the timing in at 3k rpm and never have any problems
__________________
70 L78 Nova Fathom Blue,Bench, 4spd, F41, 3:55 71 Porsche 911 Targa |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
the 93 octane is better than it used to be. I have my advance in at around 2,800 rpm's also. No vacuum advance hooked up.
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: elonblock</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: VintageMusclecar</div><div class="ubbcode-body">The 496 in my Chevelle has 11.2-1 compression with square port closed chamber heads, and runs perfectly on 92 octane. The key(s) to making it work are 1) cam timing (needs to bleed off some cylinder pressure @ lower rpm), keeping the engine coolant temps ~160°-170°, and a nice, conservative timing curve--in this instance, 14° initial and 36° total, but it doesn't come in fully until ~4000 rpm. (no vacuum advance either)
FWIW, YMMV. </div></div> Tell me more.... 1) Can you elaborate on the cam timing? 2) Please provide more detail about your experience with the cam. Thanks! </div></div> In a nutshell, it's all about managing cylinder pressure. The two things to consider are 1) static ("mechanical" ![]() A high mechanical compression ratio builds more cylinder pressure than a low one, which requires either running higher octane fuel, or using some other means to adjust the cylinder pressure. Lowering cylinder pressure can be accomplished either with a larger duration camshaft (noting the intake valve closing point) or retarding the existing camshaft in order to delay intake valve closing point. The latter is a common method among pure stock racers who are required to run an OEM camshaft as this also serves to raise the rpm power band slightly. A general rule of thumb is advancing or retarding a cam 4° will lower or raise the powerband ~200 rpm, respectively. Hopefully that all made sense. *EDIT* Lynn's response above this one re: quench is dead-on, I failed to mention it in my earlier post. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
you guys may be getting to technical for this application I believe. Its a stock motor that is getting driven occasionally. I think you are going to confuse or lose our original poster.
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: [email protected]</div><div class="ubbcode-body">you guys may be getting to technical for this application I believe. Its a stock motor that is getting driven occasionally. I think you are going to confuse or lose our original poster. </div></div>As always Eric. That is a right on statement you made. I am sure Elon wants to start this car up run down to get a newspaper on Sunday morning or an occasional drive to the Dairy Queen cruise. I would be surprised if that motor ever sees 4,000rpm's or 300 miles a year. JMO though.
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I appreciate all of the insights and feedback. My "take away" from all of this discussion is it possible to drive the car with a bit of planning regarding the areas I will be driving to, and using the correct gas and or mixture of gas.
__________________
69 COPO Camaro |
![]() |
|
|