Dedicated to the Promotion and Preservation of American Muscle Cars, Dealer built Supercars and COPO cars. |
|
|||||||
| Register | Album Gallery | Thread Gallery | FAQ | Community | Calendar | Become a Paid Member | Today's Posts | Search |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
"Bread Box" version?
I learned this term from my own TR request thread: https://www.yenko.net/ubbthreads/ubbt...413&page=1 I'm looking for a vintage TR1 or a TR2.
__________________
Marlin 70 Yenko Nova-350/360, 4speed M21, 4.10 Posi (Daddy's Ride) 69 SS Nova-396/375hp, 4speed M20, 3.55 Posi (Benjamin's Ride) 67 RS Camaro-327/250hp, 2speed Glide, & 3.08 Open (Danny's Ride) |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: YENKO DEUCE REGISTRY</div><div class="ubbcode-body">"Bread Box" version?
I'm looking for a vintage TR1 or a TR2. </div></div> Marlin, Those bread box TR1's were absolutely horrendous on the street and it takes someone with experience to set one up right and even then it won't run as good as a TR with a smaller plenum. Even Edelbrock pitched it after one year of production and went to the TR-2X and discontinued the TR1. It was a poor design to begin with. A friend of mine put one on his 70's style street rod he was building and it washed down his cylinder walls after a summer of driving and he and his friend who set it up have been setting up these systems since the mid 70's. He wanted a challenge..and it beat him. I would suggest the Edelbrock TR-2X, or better yet the Weiand or an Offenhauser-both have a smaller plenum than the TR-2X and are very early 1970's correct. Offenhauser had a very good reputation for nice running street TR's back in the 70's because they had the best plenum shape. Here is the engine in my 289 Mustang- Offenhauser with 2 Holley 390's-the pre emission carbs w/o all the smog junk on them.Disregard the date on the photo-it was not set the day I photographed it. ![]() |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Your engine looks great.
Does anyone know the time frame on the two pictured? Don't worry about Stunkards picture of the Camaro. He won't mind.
__________________
It's not the critic that counts, not the man who points out how the strong man stumbled or whether the doer of deeds could have done them better... |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Chandler</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Your engine looks great.
Does anyone know the time frame on the two pictured? Don't worry about Stunkards picture of the Camaro. He won't mind. </div></div> 1974 ish... |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Thanks. The 4150 TR in the top picture is on Ebay right now. I like the way it looks but I will stick with my Edelbrock.
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: whitetop</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Chandler</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Your engine looks great. Does anyone know the time frame on the two pictured? Don't worry about Stunkards picture of the Camaro. He won't mind. </div></div> 1974 ish... </div></div>
__________________
It's not the critic that counts, not the man who points out how the strong man stumbled or whether the doer of deeds could have done them better... |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
What would have been typical mid to late 70's?
__________________
It's not the critic that counts, not the man who points out how the strong man stumbled or whether the doer of deeds could have done them better... |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
<span style="color: #3333FF">Wow..this was a first.
What's the time period on this one ? </span>
|
![]() |
|
|