Dedicated to the Promotion and Preservation of American Muscle Cars, Dealer built Supercars and COPO cars. |
|
|||||||
| Register | Album Gallery | Thread Gallery | FAQ | Community | Calendar | Become a Paid Member | Today's Posts | Search |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
I don't understand what you mean, X22 being up side down. The 22 is not upside down and the X is symetrical so even if it were up side down it wouldn't do any difference.
The angle of the picture with the shadows give you an optical illusion of a slightly distorsion of the X. But upside down, No! Jan |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
I believe he is referring to both of the number 2's which have the curve section of the number 2 at the bottom instead of at the top.
|
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
I mostly agree with what Shauger said. This one picture is not good enough to make a good call. On the plus side the rivet goop looks original, and the 2's do not look upside down to me .
|
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: jannes_z-28</div><div class="ubbcode-body">I don't understand what you mean, X22 being up side down. The 22 is not upside down and the X is symetrical so even if it were up side down it wouldn't do any difference.
The angle of the picture with the shadows give you an optical illusion of a slightly distorsion of the X. But upside down, No! Jan </div></div> agreed the 2's are "normal" maybe because there is no paint on it or the angle of the view looks correct
__________________
Jim R Scottsdale, AZ
|
![]() |
|
|