Go Back   The Supercar Registry > General Discussion > Supercar/Musclecar Discussion


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-13-2010, 09:23 PM
John Brown's Avatar
John Brown John Brown is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: South Bend, Indiana
Posts: 2,820
Thanks: 455
Thanked 510 Times in 243 Posts
Default Re: ZL-1 block versus Can-Am block?

I don't think the Can-Am blocks had any provisions to mount a fuel pump on the block either.
__________________
......................
John Brown

This isn't rocket surgery.....
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-13-2010, 10:23 PM
Kim_Howie Kim_Howie is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Posts: 4,411
Thanks: 6
Thanked 30 Times in 18 Posts
Default Re: ZL-1 block versus Can-Am block?

I don't think they have side motor mount bosses. From what I can remember on them.
__________________
Jake is my grandson!!
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-13-2010, 10:33 PM
Kim_Howie Kim_Howie is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Posts: 4,411
Thanks: 6
Thanked 30 Times in 18 Posts
Default Re: ZL-1 block versus Can-Am block?

The motor that was in my 70 Camaro was a Can Am motor. Dave libby told me that it was. The pictures taken in 1970 prove that. The block had no winters flake on it and has a fuel pump where the fuel pump mounting boss is.
__________________
Jake is my grandson!!
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 04-13-2010, 11:47 PM
John Brown's Avatar
John Brown John Brown is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: South Bend, Indiana
Posts: 2,820
Thanks: 455
Thanked 510 Times in 243 Posts
Default Re: ZL-1 block versus Can-Am block?

From CRG.... http://www.camaros.org/copo.shtml talking about ZL1 production engines vs Can Am engines.

[ QUOTE ]
In production form, the engine differed from Can-Am configuration. The dry-sump oil passage was eliminated and provision for a mechanical fuel pump added. Production tooling was developed for the block (castings #3946052/53), cylinder heads (#3946074), and intake manifold (#3933198). A new aluminum water pump was to be included (and at least one and perhaps two Camaros were built with it), but last minute testing raised reliability questions.

Chevrolet continued to develop the Can-Am version of the aluminum big block for racing, progressing to a liner-less 390-alloy block buildable in displacements of 430, 441, 494 and 510 cubic inches. These did not have provision for a mechanical fuel pump. They were never used in production and few were produced.

[/ QUOTE ]


__________________
......................
John Brown

This isn't rocket surgery.....
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 04-14-2010, 01:09 AM
Kim_Howie Kim_Howie is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Posts: 4,411
Thanks: 6
Thanked 30 Times in 18 Posts
Default Re: ZL-1 block versus Can-Am block?

Here is a pic taken by Jon Asher in 1971. please note no winters flake & fuel pump boss.
Attached Images
 
__________________
Jake is my grandson!!
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 04-14-2010, 01:11 AM
Charley Lillard Charley Lillard is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Woodland, ca. US
Posts: 16,007
Thanks: 506
Thanked 4,819 Times in 1,237 Posts
Default Re: ZL-1 block versus Can-Am block?

What's this ?
Attached Images
 
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Charley Lillard For This Useful Post:
CanCOPO (06-27-2018)
  #7  
Old 04-14-2010, 01:33 AM
Kim_Howie Kim_Howie is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Posts: 4,411
Thanks: 6
Thanked 30 Times in 18 Posts
Default Re: ZL-1 block versus Can-Am block?

Kinda looks like some #s cast in alumium. Other than that have no clue.
__________________
Jake is my grandson!!
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 04-14-2010, 04:41 AM
olredalert olredalert is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Marine City, Mi.
Posts: 9,402
Thanks: 32,805
Thanked 4,503 Times in 1,918 Posts
Default Re: ZL-1 block versus Can-Am block?

----Charley,,,Is the second 7 really a seven??? It is obviously different than the other 7. Just wondering........Bill S
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 04-14-2010, 06:35 AM
William William is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: New Berlin WI USA
Posts: 2,658
Thanks: 252
Thanked 2,911 Times in 810 Posts
Default Re: ZL-1 block versus Can-Am block?

The true 'Can-Am' block is the unit Hot Rod magazine did a tech feature on in the Sep 1972 issue: no liners, no fuel pump.

Can-Am racers did not use the standard fuel pump so if an aluminum block has the provision it's not the Can-Am version.
__________________
Learning more and more about less and less...
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 06-26-2018, 04:52 PM
chet urbanek chet urbanek is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2018
Posts: 11
Thanks: 2
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Default Yenko can am engine

Here is some information on Yenko's ca am engine, I have owned this engine for 40 years, bought from an old drag racer, whose name is long forgotten. The engine now sits in my 1969 camaro, some call it a Yenko ZL1. It has the 4.44 bore with a 454 steel crank, ( near 500 c.i. ) The casting seems to read 3946052, same as a ZL1. I was told this is an early engine, that when Yenko bought the molds, chevy told Don to lose the winter snow flake, but forgot to tell him to change the casting number, which Do did changing it to 3946053. This engine has ZL1 aluminum heads, intake, with a 850 holly carb. pictures to comeAttachment 118460

Attachment 118461

Attachment 118462

Attachment 118463

Attachment 118464 soon

Last edited by chet urbanek; 02-04-2020 at 11:37 AM.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to chet urbanek For This Useful Post:
Craig_Maiorana (06-26-2018)
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 08:07 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.

O Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.