Go Back   The Supercar Registry > General Discussion > Supercar/Musclecar Discussion


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-13-2010, 09:12 PM
PeteLeathersac's Avatar
PeteLeathersac PeteLeathersac is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: O' Canada
Posts: 12,382
Thanks: 18,558
Thanked 5,616 Times in 2,406 Posts
Default Re: ZL-1 block versus Can-Am block?

Jenkins did run CanAm blocks...is there truth to where it came from?.
What's the casting #?.
Is there a provision in the block for a mechanical fuel pump?.
Lance 'midyr' on this site may be able to share some insight as he ran a few of these blocks back in the day and ended up w/ what was left of Geo. Eaton's CanAm stuff..


~ Pete
__________________
I like real cars best...especially the REAL real ones!
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-13-2010, 09:23 PM
John Brown's Avatar
John Brown John Brown is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: South Bend, Indiana
Posts: 2,820
Thanks: 455
Thanked 510 Times in 243 Posts
Default Re: ZL-1 block versus Can-Am block?

I don't think the Can-Am blocks had any provisions to mount a fuel pump on the block either.
__________________
......................
John Brown

This isn't rocket surgery.....
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-13-2010, 10:23 PM
Kim_Howie Kim_Howie is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Posts: 4,411
Thanks: 6
Thanked 30 Times in 18 Posts
Default Re: ZL-1 block versus Can-Am block?

I don't think they have side motor mount bosses. From what I can remember on them.
__________________
Jake is my grandson!!
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 04-13-2010, 10:33 PM
Kim_Howie Kim_Howie is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Posts: 4,411
Thanks: 6
Thanked 30 Times in 18 Posts
Default Re: ZL-1 block versus Can-Am block?

The motor that was in my 70 Camaro was a Can Am motor. Dave libby told me that it was. The pictures taken in 1970 prove that. The block had no winters flake on it and has a fuel pump where the fuel pump mounting boss is.
__________________
Jake is my grandson!!
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 04-13-2010, 11:47 PM
John Brown's Avatar
John Brown John Brown is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: South Bend, Indiana
Posts: 2,820
Thanks: 455
Thanked 510 Times in 243 Posts
Default Re: ZL-1 block versus Can-Am block?

From CRG.... http://www.camaros.org/copo.shtml talking about ZL1 production engines vs Can Am engines.

[ QUOTE ]
In production form, the engine differed from Can-Am configuration. The dry-sump oil passage was eliminated and provision for a mechanical fuel pump added. Production tooling was developed for the block (castings #3946052/53), cylinder heads (#3946074), and intake manifold (#3933198). A new aluminum water pump was to be included (and at least one and perhaps two Camaros were built with it), but last minute testing raised reliability questions.

Chevrolet continued to develop the Can-Am version of the aluminum big block for racing, progressing to a liner-less 390-alloy block buildable in displacements of 430, 441, 494 and 510 cubic inches. These did not have provision for a mechanical fuel pump. They were never used in production and few were produced.

[/ QUOTE ]


__________________
......................
John Brown

This isn't rocket surgery.....
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 04-14-2010, 01:09 AM
Kim_Howie Kim_Howie is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Posts: 4,411
Thanks: 6
Thanked 30 Times in 18 Posts
Default Re: ZL-1 block versus Can-Am block?

Here is a pic taken by Jon Asher in 1971. please note no winters flake & fuel pump boss.
Attached Images
 
__________________
Jake is my grandson!!
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 04-14-2010, 01:11 AM
Charley Lillard Charley Lillard is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Woodland, ca. US
Posts: 15,981
Thanks: 495
Thanked 4,771 Times in 1,222 Posts
Default Re: ZL-1 block versus Can-Am block?

What's this ?
Attached Images
 
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Charley Lillard For This Useful Post:
CanCOPO (06-27-2018)
  #8  
Old 04-13-2010, 11:56 PM
PeteLeathersac's Avatar
PeteLeathersac PeteLeathersac is offline
Yenko Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: O' Canada
Posts: 12,382
Thanks: 18,558
Thanked 5,616 Times in 2,406 Posts
Default Re: ZL-1 block versus Can-Am block?

Here's the block casting #'s and info I've collected..
Please feel free to add the missing & more info also clarify and/or correct any mistakes..


Can-Am blocks 68/69 - Reynolds
# 0-294550 = Linerless?
# 0-321270 = Linerless?
# O-326711 = 4.44" bore with steel liners (427 ci)

Can-Am blocks 70/71 - Reynolds?.
# O-399204 = 4.5" bore and steel liners (509 ci)
# O-495102 = 4.5" bore and no liners

ZL-1 Factory blocks - 1969 - Winters
# 3946052 (No 'O') 427 ci.

ZL-1 Factory blocks - 1997 & up
# 3946053 (No 'O') 427 ci.

# 3992038 (O?) * may be 4.44" bore w/ Liners - era?.

# ? - Yenko - Casting has YENKO
# ? - Yenko - Casting has Y E N K O
# ? - Yenko - Casting has Yenko Crest Logo

# 3946502 is the # quoted on the Guinn's Engineering site but the # is actually 3946052 as shown in their pics..


~ Pete

--------------------
I like real cars best...especially the REAL real ones!

Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 05:04 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.

O Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.