![]() Dedicated to the Promotion and Preservation of American Muscle Cars, Dealer built Supercars and COPO cars. |
|
Register | Album Gallery | Thread Gallery | FAQ | Community | Calendar | Become a Paid Member | Today's Posts | Search |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Jenkins did run CanAm blocks...is there truth to where it came from?.
What's the casting #?. Is there a provision in the block for a mechanical fuel pump?. Lance 'midyr' on this site may be able to share some insight as he ran a few of these blocks back in the day and ended up w/ what was left of Geo. Eaton's CanAm stuff.. ![]() ~ Pete
__________________
I like real cars best...especially the REAL real ones! |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I don't think the Can-Am blocks had any provisions to mount a fuel pump on the block either.
__________________
...................... John Brown This isn't rocket surgery..... |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I don't think they have side motor mount bosses. From what I can remember on them.
![]()
__________________
Jake is my grandson!! |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The motor that was in my 70 Camaro was a Can Am motor. Dave libby told me that it was. The pictures taken in 1970 prove that. The block had no winters flake on it and has a fuel pump where the fuel pump mounting boss is.
![]() ![]()
__________________
Jake is my grandson!! |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
From CRG.... http://www.camaros.org/copo.shtml talking about ZL1 production engines vs Can Am engines.
[ QUOTE ] In production form, the engine differed from Can-Am configuration. The dry-sump oil passage was eliminated and provision for a mechanical fuel pump added. Production tooling was developed for the block (castings #3946052/53), cylinder heads (#3946074), and intake manifold (#3933198). A new aluminum water pump was to be included (and at least one and perhaps two Camaros were built with it), but last minute testing raised reliability questions. Chevrolet continued to develop the Can-Am version of the aluminum big block for racing, progressing to a liner-less 390-alloy block buildable in displacements of 430, 441, 494 and 510 cubic inches. These did not have provision for a mechanical fuel pump. They were never used in production and few were produced. [/ QUOTE ] ![]()
__________________
...................... John Brown This isn't rocket surgery..... |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Here is a pic taken by Jon Asher in 1971. please note no winters flake & fuel pump boss.
![]()
__________________
Jake is my grandson!! |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Here's the block casting #'s and info I've collected..
Please feel free to add the missing & more info also clarify and/or correct any mistakes.. Can-Am blocks 68/69 - Reynolds # 0-294550 = Linerless? # 0-321270 = Linerless? # O-326711 = 4.44" bore with steel liners (427 ci) Can-Am blocks 70/71 - Reynolds?. # O-399204 = 4.5" bore and steel liners (509 ci) # O-495102 = 4.5" bore and no liners ZL-1 Factory blocks - 1969 - Winters # 3946052 (No 'O') 427 ci. ZL-1 Factory blocks - 1997 & up # 3946053 (No 'O') 427 ci. # 3992038 (O?) * may be 4.44" bore w/ Liners - era?. # ? - Yenko - Casting has YENKO # ? - Yenko - Casting has Y E N K O # ? - Yenko - Casting has Yenko Crest Logo # 3946502 is the # quoted on the Guinn's Engineering site but the # is actually 3946052 as shown in their pics.. ![]() ~ Pete -------------------- I like real cars best...especially the REAL real ones! |
![]() |
|
|