![]() Dedicated to the Promotion and Preservation of American Muscle Cars, Dealer built Supercars and COPO cars. |
|
Register | Album Gallery | Thread Gallery | FAQ | Community | Calendar | Become a Paid Member | Today's Posts | Search |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
You need to talk with CHP. JM is the man with the 302. We sent our 302 to him and he gets stoudt numbers out of them and they run on pump gas and built the way the factory built them. Ken Veit has some of his stuff at CHP too. That should make a statement. Watch the Mcneich You tube video in the pit section here. One guy posted he walks the walk and talks the talk. Thanks to SYC for getting me and my boys hooked up with someone we can trust.
Good luck, Bob |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
That's good to know. I have the heart and sole for a 302.
__________________
Jed 69,70,71 Nova's 1955 Bel Air and a 69 Camaro. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hey Lynn,
The two Zs we built were both -140 cams. One NOS, the other a "new" cam. No issues with either. Have a Comp 3030 in the box here at the shop. Don't know which brand the "new" cam was, but can find out if you want.
__________________
TheMuscleCarGuys.com |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
CHP likes the Comp Cam 30-30. That is what we will use.......maybe. Also has another that we are thinking about using close to the 140. Engine he built with this cam made like 420-425 HP. Very stoudt.
Still won't give me HP numbers on that wheel standing stocker of his. Bob |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
You can probably figure the hp of his car pretty close by how fast, the car weight and so forth. He is running in D/Stock. Hopefully Pomona will be nice and cool and he will run a 10.50, maybe even in the high 40's. Don't worry about dyno numbers, worry about how fast you go and all the BB's you beat!
![]() ![]() |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I've always heard that the #140 Off-Road Camshaft was just what it's name implies and that the stock Street Z/28 (#178) was much better for a street car. Chevrolet's 60's era musclecar camshafts were notorious for lots of duration, especially that #140 Off-Road Cam. As it's name implies, it's geared towards lightened Trans Am-style race cars that spend ALL of their time at high RPM zipping through corners and blasting down straightaways. Those small cubic inch 302's aren't known for having loads of torque anyway. If you've ever driven a four speed street car with a massive duration camshaft, it's really not a lot of fun and at least 4.11's in the rear axle is an absolute must to try to compensate for it. My vote is for the stock #178 Z/28 camshaft.
__________________
1962 Biscayne O-21669 MKIV/M-22 1962 Bel Air Sport Coupe 409/1,000 |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mark,
We have the 178 cam in the engine that I sent to CHP. Car was a turd with it. 3.73 gear and M21. We will change that. From what I was told by CHP and others who know the 302 better than anyone is that this engine needs gearing for it to perform like a performance car. Camshafts will not give this engine more torque. One of my best buddies bought a brand new 68 Z8. 3.73 and M21. He sold it less than a year later because he was very disappointed in the performance. Back then, D. Harrell told him that these engines need gearing too. Doing that awakes a sleeping giant. Bob |
![]() |
|
|